Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Owen:
Others too may remember the use of a noise source comprising a gas tube crossways in a piece of waveguide (with 50 ohm probes) to estimate noise figure in the VT days. One would fire the gas tube and it was estimated to have a very large, "known" noise temp. Boiling water, while a known temp., would not have been hot enough. Ice water was critical in the use of the HILLMS receiver used to measure absolute flux. The antenna was a very long horn antenna resting on the side of a deep gully. In those days, a horn antenna was one of the few antennas with a predictable gain. The receiver switched at a low frequency between the antenna and a load kept in ice water. The gain of the receiver was stabilized with a huge amount of negative feedback. Once a day, the source would pass through the antenna's beam and a strip chart recorder would indicate the difference between ice water and the source's temp. Today, with much lower NF, and much more EM pollution, different techniques might be used. 73 Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: "Owen Duffy" wrote in message Dave Oldridge wrote in Near as I could measure it, the NF of the receiver after my mod was 1.2db. I had to resort to boiling and freezing water and a tiny dummy load to measure it at all. I haven't tried hot/cold tests using ice and boiling water, I didn't think it was practical. You finally measured a receiver noise temperature of 50K with hot and cold loads of 270 and 370. That means a Y factor of 1.059dB. If Y were just 0.1dB greater, NF would be 0.78dB, 0.1dB lower and, NF would be 1.66dB. With this configuration the sensitivity of NF to changes in Y are extreme, 0.4dB change in NF per 0.1dB change in Y around that point. If you made the Y measurements using the audio output of a narrow band receiver, it is very hard to make high resolution measurements (eg to 0.01dB resolution) with say, a multimeter. I have done these tests with a liquid nitrogen cooled load and room temperature load, and that gives more practical Y ratios, 3.7dB for a 1.2dBNF, and the sensitivity in NF is 0.08dB per 0.1dB change in Y. This still demands high resolution measurement of noise power. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|