Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 30, 7:26 pm, "Harold E. Johnson" wrote:
Apparently those mm waves liked that plastic lens just fine. In fact, that would work fine at 10GHz, at 1GHz, and even at 1MHz, though the amount of material you'd have to use for the lens gets prohibitive at lower frequencies. It's all engineering tradeoffs. I know that "geodesic" lenses are used in some radar systems; the idea is that you have the signal travel a longer path (through a curved waveguide structure) in the center of the antenna/feed than it does toward the edges, just as in a convex lens the light in the center of the beam is slowed for a greater distance (and therefore retarded more) than the light at the outer edges. I expect the boundary between "optics" and "electronics" will blur even more than it is already as both electronics and optical technologies continue to advance. Cheers, Tom Hi Tom, we've used plastic lensing since at least the late 60's for focusing mundane 4-12 GHz radio waves. Dielectric refraction was used back then to extract additional gain from dish antennas by allowing more even illumination of the dish without illuminating the area around the dish. Harris radio had a patent on it. W4ZCB Hi Harold, Yep. The radar stuff I wrote about is from that era. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see mention of it from well before that; certainly we knew about the effect that makes dielectric lens action possible for RF (which is after all just a continuation of the spectrum that includes visible light) since before we knew how to generate appreciable energy at microwave frequencies. Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
radio astronomy | Equipment | |||
radio astronomy | Equipment | |||
radio astronomy | Equipment | |||
amateur radio/astronomy Web Site Updated | Homebrew | |||
Fan of astronomy and VLF ? | General |