Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rick (W-A-one-R-K-T)" wrote in message news ![]() I just read the following on one of the mailing lists I subscribe to: "Quarter wave ground mounted radials are a waste of wire and a hold over from the olden days. Check the antenna handbook, the new philosophy is more and shorter. The thing is that the bulk of the energy from the vertical antenna is near the base of the antenna and this is what you are trying to capture. A quarter wave radial sounds logical but the planet will detune it so a quarter wave means nothing to the current." What say you all? Hi Rick I have just tried an HF 80 metre ground mounted quarter wave vertical in exactly the conditions you describe. The screen of the coax feedline is grounded at the base of the antenna with a copper earth rod into very conductive ground (effectively wet sand). The antenna impedence and performance appeared identical whether or not quarter wave radials were attached or not. At a previous location with less conductive soil the radials did make a difference. A couple of quarter wave radials can certainly be effective and easier to run out than a multitude of shorter wires circling the antenna. As usual it all depends on the local conditions at your location and what you have available to work with. Mike G0ULI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? | Policy | |||
Ground Plane construction vs pre-printed "protoboards" | Homebrew | |||
"Can twisted wire replace shielded wire?" | Shortwave |