Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:56:27 GMT, "Wayne"
wrote: It would be interesting to follow the change in VSWR as you add individual radials. Some years ago, there was a discussion of adding radials until the VSWR stopped increasing. This was based on an expected feedpoint resistance of 36 ohms, and an assumption that the ground losses were 15 ohms or less. So at the worst case, the VSWR was near 1:1. The best case, with a ground loss approaching 0 ohms, would have a VSWR of 50/36= 1.39:1. Hi Wayne, This strategy may also have you stop adding radials too early when your antenna presented 36 Ohms looking into a ground loss of 33 Ohms (same SWR of 1.39). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Clark" wrote in message
The best case, with a ground loss approaching 0 ohms, would have a VSWR of 50/36= 1.39:1. ___________ A set of 120 buried radials each at least 1/4-wave long (free space value) will produce an r-f ground resistance of around 2 ohms, maybe less in soil with very good conductivity. But in any case the impedance existing between the base of a series-fed vertical monopole and the common point of the buried radials will depend on the electrical height of the monopole which includes the ratio of its height to its width, as well as the r-f resistance in the ground system itself. Broadcast stations will install the tower and radials, measure the Z from the tower base to the radials, and transform whatever that value is to 50 +j0 ohms using a network at the base of the tower. Fewer radials will mean that the ground loss will increase, and system radiation efficiency will decrease (even if the VSWR is 1:1) RF |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:56:27 GMT, "Wayne" wrote: It would be interesting to follow the change in VSWR as you add individual radials. Some years ago, there was a discussion of adding radials until the VSWR stopped increasing. This was based on an expected feedpoint resistance of 36 ohms, and an assumption that the ground losses were 15 ohms or less. So at the worst case, the VSWR was near 1:1. The best case, with a ground loss approaching 0 ohms, would have a VSWR of 50/36= 1.39:1. Hi Wayne, This strategy may also have you stop adding radials too early when your antenna presented 36 Ohms looking into a ground loss of 33 Ohms (same SWR of 1.39). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Right. I guess the better way to state it is to stop adding radials when the r component stops dropping. I've always wanted to try that experiment, but real estate considerations have prevented it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? | Policy | |||
Ground Plane construction vs pre-printed "protoboards" | Homebrew | |||
"Can twisted wire replace shielded wire?" | Shortwave |