Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message news ![]() Jim Kelley wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: An *ordinary prudent man* would think that one foot of wire is a "simple series circuit" and it is in a DC circuit. Most ordinary prudent men that I know wouldn't characterize a one foot length of wire as a series circuit. More silly word games - when it is in a DC circuit the current is constant. When it exists in a simple series GHz circuit with reflections, the current is not constant. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com you don't even need reflections. a properly terminated piece of wire has a different current at every point along the wire. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
you don't even need reflections. a properly terminated piece of wire has a different current at every point along the wire. That's true but the attenuation factor in one foot of wire might be hard to measure. Introduce reflections and even a lossless wire will vary the current from max to min every few inches at GHz frequencies. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Dave wrote: you don't even need reflections. a properly terminated piece of wire has a different current at every point along the wire. That's true but the attenuation factor in one foot of wire might be hard to measure. Introduce reflections and even a lossless wire will vary the current from max to min every few inches at GHz frequencies. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com you don't need any loss either. a properly matched lossless line will have different current at each point along the line. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
you don't need any loss either. a properly matched lossless line will have different current at each point along the line. Different RMS current? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
"You don`t even need reflections. A properly terminated piece of wire has a different current at every point along the wire." Instantaneous values, of course. But, proper termination means no reflection. The only source of variation along a line other than attenuation is reflection. In a uniform line, attenuation causes a steady decline of energy as energy travels. With a lossless line, properly terminated, variation of rnergy along a line is only the phase produced instantaneois values along the line. These are resolved during the period of a cycle by the root mean square calculation. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Harrison" wrote in message ... Dave wrote: "You don`t even need reflections. A properly terminated piece of wire has a different current at every point along the wire." Instantaneous values, of course. But, proper termination means no reflection. The only source of variation along a line other than attenuation is reflection. In a uniform line, attenuation causes a steady decline of energy as energy travels. With a lossless line, properly terminated, variation of rnergy along a line is only the phase produced instantaneois values along the line. These are resolved during the period of a cycle by the root mean square calculation. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI and what is wrong with instantaneous values? lacking a requirement to talk in peak, phasor, rms, or some other averaging method it is perfectly valid to assume instantaneous measurements. and if I remember right we were talking of measuring current, not energy. and time is a valid parameter when measuring current, just hook up your o-scope and measure away... measure that current on each end of a wire, or coil, or coax, with a dual trace scope and see the difference! throw away that silly-wire-reader thing and get back to the basics. get a pulse generator and build yourself a reflectometer and make use of those reflections! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
and what is wrong with instantaneous values? Nothing if presented as part of the context, confusing if not since most people would assume the context is RMS. Do I have 110v AC in my house? You can argue that the answer is "no" but you would need to state the context. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Harrison wrote: Dave wrote: "You don`t even need reflections. A properly terminated piece of wire has a different current at every point along the wire." Instantaneous values, of course. But, proper termination means no reflection. The only source of variation along a line other than attenuation is reflection. The only electromagnetic currents 'flowing' on a transmission line are the currents which result from the reflected and/or the forward electromagnetic waves. Neither of these currents varies periodically along the line (except as noted, instantaneously). 73, ac6xg |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave wrote: "Cecil Moore" wrote in message news ![]() Jim Kelley wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: An *ordinary prudent man* would think that one foot of wire is a "simple series circuit" and it is in a DC circuit. Most ordinary prudent men that I know wouldn't characterize a one foot length of wire as a series circuit. More silly word games - when it is in a DC circuit the current is constant. When it exists in a simple series GHz circuit with reflections, the current is not constant. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com you don't even need reflections. a properly terminated piece of wire has a different current at every point along the wire. At any given instant. :-) ac6xg |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Kelley" wrote in message ... Dave wrote: "Cecil Moore" wrote in message news ![]() Jim Kelley wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: An *ordinary prudent man* would think that one foot of wire is a "simple series circuit" and it is in a DC circuit. Most ordinary prudent men that I know wouldn't characterize a one foot length of wire as a series circuit. More silly word games - when it is in a DC circuit the current is constant. When it exists in a simple series GHz circuit with reflections, the current is not constant. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com you don't even need reflections. a properly terminated piece of wire has a different current at every point along the wire. At any given instant. :-) ac6xg TADA! And Jim gets the cigar! Cecil, you take too narrow a view. at any given instant in time if you measure the current along a properly matched wire you will measure a different current and voltage all along the wire (repeating every wavelength minus losses of course). nothing was stated that required rms, other average, peak, or phasor representation. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? | Policy | |||
Ground Plane construction vs pre-printed "protoboards" | Homebrew | |||
"Can twisted wire replace shielded wire?" | Shortwave |