Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 23, 6:10 pm, "Dave" wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message ... Dave wrote: ... ok... now if you have a LAW that is different than what is put down in the existing maxwell's 4 equations you must be able to write the equations that make your law different than his. if you can't do that, its no better than a bag of hot air. so show your calculations, write a paper, get it published and show the rest of the world that uses those equations and gets perfectly valid results why we are all wrong. Who are you to tell him to shut up? Don't you realize you only manage to make yourself look the idiot?--Well of course not, that is quite obvious! You think you will tell the rest of us how to conduct ourselves when you are finished with him? Just where in the hell do you come from? And, what the hell makes you have any right whatsoever to do so? Go away--PLONK! JS go plonk yourself... i am simply challenging someone who has shown himself to be full of hot air to properly explain his revolutionary law that has evaded the rest of the world, and who has been handwaviing and telling everyone that he has this great new law... but can never explain it in terms that anyone understands... just more handwaving and generalizing. if you can't take a challenge then you don't belong on usenet. and art sure doesn't need you to defend him, he does well enough to make an ass of himself. I'd ignore him. The moron can't even read properly... I see no text written where you tell Art to shut up, or even write at a lighter shade of print for that matter.. I think "John Smith", or "Bret", or whoever the heck he really is, would prefer that Art brainwash all the unsuspecting readers into thinking what he writes is true fact without question. Who cares if it's total BS or not, it's new! "John Smith" doesn't care if it's all BS or not, just as long as it's some new theory that seems to contradict old established theory. He has shown repeated disdain for proven established theory. He thinks that being most that wrote it are either dead, or in an advanced age state, that obviously it can't fit in with the "New World Order" of code toads that dabble with antennas on occasion. After all, most lived decades ago. What could they possibly know compared to a code toad that is living in the early part of the 21st century? I envision him as the type that probably believes most of what he hears on Coast to Coast AM.. Did I mention that he's a prime time smartass? Probably not needed, being you got a taste first hand. Don't worry about looking like an idiot. Anyone with half a brain can see where that dubious honor really belongs.. It might have to be shared by two people though... :/ But at least Art is not really a smartass. I'll give him that.. He's just confused... I have much less problem with that, than I do a smartass. Art is confusing the minds of new or unsuspecting readers with all his "theory" though. Thats why he gets so much flak. Some of his stuff makes the "EH" antenna guy actually look sane by comparison.. And thats kinda scary... :/ MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another act of Republican "these laws are for everyone but us": | Shortwave | |||
SCANNER EAVESDROPPING LAWS | Swap | |||
Scanning laws around the world? | Scanner | |||
Scanner Laws | Scanner |