Michael Coslo wrote:

...
Build one of those bad boys, put it on an antenna range, test it out and
let the decibels fall where they may. All else is just netnews s/n.

Proof would shut us close minded ones up would it not? Then the
antenna will become status quo, and we will rush to defend it.


- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

A million visions hit me where the status quo is unusable--college
dorms, hotel rooms, camping grounds in national forests,
secure-elite-gated communities where "keeping up with the joneses" is in
vogue (and, I am stuck in one--for a bit anyway :-( ), a beach, etc., etc.

I have already stated, canned antennas and the software to define them
have a REAL place ... it is only the idiots who shout down everyone else
who are in question! Personally, I need the art of small/stealth
antennas to expand ... I can't believe I am the only one; I am just
more vocal to their importance.

I have already had complaints about the American Flag flying on my 50
ft. pole, so far, NOT flying the flag has appeased the "complainers"--go
figure! Any day now, they will eventually notice the pole is still
there. Then I'll be stuck with the DLM posing as a drain pipe ...

And, there are errors and missing sections in our complete understanding
of antennas, em/photon radiation, etc.--those who will bother to examine
the evidence already know this--those who are either unable or unwilling
to do so never will.

Regards,
JS