Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps?
"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality."--Albert Einstein And, I humbly propose: "Too often, the ignorant are quick to conceal their ignorance in complexity not well grasped by common men."--John Smith Regards, JS |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And, I humbly propose:
"Too often, the ignorant are quick to conceal their ignorance in complexity not well grasped by common men."--John Smith Regards, JS I represent that remark. my good man. My ignorance will heretofore never be concealed again. I can display my ignorance with the best of'em. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hal Rosser wrote:
... I represent that remark. my good man. My ignorance will heretofore never be concealed again. I can display my ignorance with the best of'em. Hal: Interesting, I agree! We are all ignorant on some points, it is mankinds' lot. The wiser will attempt to gain understanding to cure this "disorder." The "terminally ignorant" will maintain their status ... Regards, JS |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John Smith wrote: Perhaps? "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality."--Albert Einstein And, I humbly propose: "Too often, the ignorant are quick to conceal their ignorance in complexity not well grasped by common men."--John Smith I think that's true. I like it. I like this one too: "He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know." ac6xg |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
"He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know." In the same vein: Better to appear ignorant than open one's mouth and remove all doubt. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
In the same vein: Better to appear ignorant than open one's mouth and remove all doubt. :-) Cecil: You got it pegged. However, admitting ones ignorance demands they attempt to remedy it. And, certainly demands more respect ... In such a world, the silent-ignorant-majority would rein supreme! (and, most likely, only hold dialog in CW) ;-) Regards, JS |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
However, admitting ones ignorance demands they attempt to remedy it. And, certainly demands more respect ... I've found that leading questions, no matter how ignorant-sounding, are a good learning tool for everyone, including me. :-) Example question to someone on eHam.net who says: "All you need is a 4:1 balun placed outside the shack at the end of the balanced line to convert to coax." Where are you going to find a 200 ohm impedance to match that 4:1 balun that you are recommending for use in your non-resonant system? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
John Smith wrote: However, admitting ones ignorance demands they attempt to remedy it. And, certainly demands more respect ... I've found that leading questions, no matter how ignorant-sounding, are a good learning tool for everyone, including me. :-) Example question to someone on eHam.net who says: "All you need is a 4:1 balun placed outside the shack at the end of the balanced line to convert to coax." Where are you going to find a 200 ohm impedance to match that 4:1 balun that you are recommending for use in your non-resonant system? With no system to tune the 200 (+/-) antenna to resonance--only at a relatively few frequencies on the dial--unless the antenna, itself, was only constructed for use on a relatively narrow band (or, perhaps harmonically related narrow bands) ... sounds to me, some system of causing resonance was implied? However, and perhaps contrary to logic, I have seen 4:1 (2:1 to 9:1 for that matter--and certainly "choke baluns") baluns cause a general gain in general performance--and do this more often than not. Forced to report just what my "eyes" have seen--I, "ignorantly", must state--go figure ... but then again, if it walks like a duck ... Regards, JS |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: "He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know." In the same vein: Better to appear ignorant than open one's mouth and remove all doubt. :-) I agree. Standing around with your mouth hanging open does tend to make one appear ignorant. :-) ac6xg |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
... I think that's true. I like it. I like this one too: "He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know." ac6xg I disagree ... "Those who seldom open their mouths seldom have opportunity to cure their ignorance."--John Smith "To admit ones ignorance implies the desire to dispel it."--John Smith "There are no stupid questions, only people too stupid to pose questions."--John Smith "Those who attempt control usually end up stagnating in rec.radio.amateur.moderated"--John Smith Regards, JS |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What Albert Einstein said about Radio. | Shortwave | |||
What Albert Einstein said about Radio. | Shortwave | |||
Rape Suspect in Detroit | Shortwave |