Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:26:59 -0400, "Jimmie D"
wrote: "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... "Kenneth Grimm, K4XL" wrote in : I'm installing a new tower and bought, as part of the package, the grounding kit. This consists of four 10 ft copper clad ground rods, plus all the accessories needed to connect them to the tower. My problem is that after about 5 feet of good old red clay I hit solid rock. I'm tempted to cut the 10 ft rods in half and simply have eight 5 ft rods. Since this is the only practical alternative that I can see. Will the eight 5 ft rods give me the same "ground" as the four 10 ft rods? Or, do I need to add even more 5 ft rods to achieve the same ground? ( I knew I should have bought that Megger at the hamfest. ) Ken, Some thoughts... The main reason for using driven electrodes at the tower base is for lightning protection. I assume that is your purpose. To predict the effect of driving a number of electrodes, and the depth of driving, you have to consider the effect of the soil. It has high resistivity, and resistivity often changes with depth. Clay soils are likely to be drier at the surface, and higher in resistivity. So, longer electrodes are often more effective because they reach down to wetter layers, and it is not unusual that an 8' electrode has a quarter the resistance of a 4' electrode for that reason. Hitting rock isn't necessarily all bad, it sometimes happens that the rock causes wetter clay above it, and shorter electrodes may be quite effective. You can assess the likely outcome by driving two separated electrodes and measuring the resistance. You can estimate the benefit of driving further adequately spaced electrodes (assuming uniform soil). Dont overlook using the reinforced concrete base of the antenna as part of your ground system. A megger! No, if your earth system is any good, a megger isn't going to be useful. There are a number of techniques for measuring the effective low frequency resistance of an earth electrode or earth system. Google for things like the "three wire fall of potential method". If you can't get sufficiently good earth from driving the electrodes as is, choices include drilling (more effective in soft porous wet rock) or strip electrodes laid in trenches. As for the 30deg sledge hammer, I put some notes and a pic together on tools for driving earth electrodes, see http://www.vk1od.net/post/driver.htm . The smallest tool was fabricated after recent discussion on using an SDS Rotary Hammer to drive earth electrodes. Owen One way to determine the low frequency effectiveness of a ground is to connect the hot side of the power mains to the ground through a fuse and see how big of a fuse you can blow. There are special devices built for doing this but it can easily and safely be done with less than professional equipment. Just get all the pets and kids out of the way first. Jimmie Thanks, Jimmie, but I'm not *that* interested. If anyone was doing this, I would want to be with the pets and kids!! 8*) Ken K4XL *** BoatAnchor Manual Archive *** On the web at http://bama.sbc.edu and http://bama.edebris.com FTP site info: bama.sbc.edu login: anonymous p/w: youremailadr |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transforming your simple Ground Rod into a Ground Anchor : Is It Worth The Work ? - You Decide ! | Shortwave | |||
antenna lengths | Antenna | |||
In a ground plane, what dictates the number and spacing of radials? | Antenna | |||
Antenna lengths (apart) | Antenna | |||
Want to buy : lengths of small phillystand | Swap |