Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm a new ham, and I'm looking for my first HF transceiver. I am considering the Yaesu FT-817ND. I did some google searches and could not find any information about using an antenna tuner with this rig. How can it work on all bands without a tuner? Would I need a tuner or does the supplied antenna work on all bands without a tuner? I browsed the owner's manual on Yaesu's web site as well and didn't see any mention about using a tuner. The link to yaesu's page is http://www.yaesu.com/indexVS.cfm?cmd...5&isArchived=0 I read some reviews on eHam too, and it almost sounds like the FT-817ND doesn't need a tuner.. I'm confused. Any opinions would be helpful. Thanks! Jim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHB9xdQuDJiZ/QrH0RArUmAJ960JEMQHpTR+3SF6bUAi8TX4entACfZHbU g25V9E2uKv0sgAClBD9zyb0= =BD4f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi, I'm a new ham, and I'm looking for my first HF transceiver. I am considering the Yaesu FT-817ND. I did some google searches and could not find any information about using an antenna tuner with this rig. How can it work on all bands without a tuner? Would I need a tuner or does the supplied antenna work on all bands without a tuner? I'm not sure what you are referring to regarding the "supplied antenna". The FT-817 does come with a small VHF antenna for 2 meter operation, but like all other HF transceivers, it does not come with any HF antenna. You can build yourself some dipole antennas for the bands you want to operate on.... they would be resonant and have a 50 ohm feedpoint so you would not need any tuner.... ( the output connection to almost all radios has a 50 ohm impedance). If you want to use a non- resonant antenna, then an outboard Tuner should work fine.... as long as it is capable of operating at low power levels of 5Watts or less. LDG Electronics makes some fine QRP type tuners. My old LDG Z-11 tuner works great with my FT-817. Ed K7AAT |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , James
Barrett wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm a new ham, and I'm looking for my first HF transceiver. I am considering the Yaesu FT-817ND. I'm a new ham using the FT-817ND. I wish I had gotten a 100-watt rig as my first transmitter and gotten the low-power 817ND later. I do like the idea of QRP (low power) operation but it requires patience and some experience with knowing when the bands are open. Probably not the best choice for a new ham. I did some google searches and could not find any information about using an antenna tuner with this rig. How can it work on all bands without a tuner? For the frequencies above 30 MHz you can use the whip antenna that comes with the 817ND. No tuner will be needed. For the frequencies below 30 MHz you need some sort of outdoor antenna. You can find some ready to use antennas at the MFJ Enterprises web site among many other places. One example of a way to go is this. Get a simple dipole antenna for the 80 meter band and install it outdoors. You can use that antenna on the band it's made for without a tuner. With the help of a tuner (such as the automatic Z-11 Pro by LDG Electronics) you could also use that antenna on higher frequencies such as the 40 meter band, the 30 meter band, etc. sincerely, anonymous in Florida -- -30- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anonymous wrote:
I'm a new ham using the FT-817ND. I wish I had gotten a 100-watt rig as my first transmitter and gotten the low-power 817ND later. I do like the idea of QRP (low power) operation but it requires patience and some experience with knowing when the bands are open. Probably not the best choice for a new ham. As someone who is on the other end of the signal path, I can tell you that 100 watts is not going to make much of a difference if the band is not "open". Your signal would be stronger and the two "S units" or so may bring it above the noise (or not), but if I can't hear you at all, 5 watts, 100 watts, 1000 watts, or even 100,000 watts is not going to make your signal show up somewhere there is no propigation to. It WILL help for crowded bands, where hearing your signal a little louder than the others, or at least not being lost in a pile-up, but that comes back to skill and patience. Timing is also critical, when I can hear U.S. stations it's around sunrise and sunset here. Sunrise is when most U.S. hams are asleep (around 11pm-1am EST) and just getting to work when the sun sets. You also can't guess it by looking out the window, since I'm closer to the equator, days are shorter in the summer and longer in the winter. I know the bands do open, on contest weekends, they suddenly "come alive". The other problem is the bands themselves. Our 80m band goes to 3850 and while legally 40m now goes to 7200, in practice, it stops at 7100 where the zillion watt SWBC stations make ham communications impossible. Quite simply, you can call "CQ DX" on 75m or 40m and no one this side of the world will hear you and if we do and reply, you won't hear us unless you are listening where we may transmit. So skill, patience, and timing are as important as the bands being open, and IMHO more important than how much power you use. You will also find that if you tell people you are QRP, they often make things easier for you, such as "CQ DX CQ DX DE (or "this is" for voice) callsign QRP". Repeat your callsign several times slowly and phoneticaly for voice and for CW don't call CQ faster than you the slowest speed you want to copy. You also should LISTEN for a while so you understand what the other operator wants. If you want quick contacts for points or QSL cards, don't answer a CQ or call someone who likes to chat and vice versa. Since this is an antenna group, having a good low noise antenna in a low noise location helps. If all you hear is S9+ noise, you won't make many contacts. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Jim
I haven't seen a simple answer to your question yet! - I can see nothing in URL you sent to indicate that the radio has an internal antenna tuner. ATU's running to coaxial (SO239/M) connectors can be horribly lossy as well. (Or at least in the coax run from it to the antenna) If it had a tuner as a "feature" it would say so to enhance the products capabilities. - If the antenna you are using presents a suitable load to the radio then you don't need a standalone tuner. I don't actually run a tuner, having built antennas that cover my bands of interest. - If you want to have (say) just one simple antenna up, yes you'll need a tuner with this radio (or some other method to match things. Lots of possibilities to research here!) - Keep in mind that with such a low output power the voltage handling specs of you tuning components are much lower. Very easy to throw one together with junk box parts. Cheers Bob VK2YQA James Barrett wrote: Hi, I'm a new ham, and I'm looking for my first HF transceiver. I am considering the Yaesu FT-817ND. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Bob Bob wrote: Hi Jim I haven't seen a simple answer to your question yet! I don't mind all the different answers. It actually helps me to figure out what it's all about. I think my first misunderstanding about the Yaesu was that in reading the owner's manual, I had been expecting it to have a built-in automatic tuner (the Icom 703+ has one). When I read about the VHF antenna which comes with the radio it made it seem like I could use it on all bands.. of course I misunderstood what I was reading. I understand now that it does not have a built in tuner, and I would either have to use an external tuner or use a resonant antenna for whichever band I was going to use. At any rate, if I go with the Yaesu, one benefit would be that I would gain experience in building and tuning my own antennas. That is something I am interested in. Having an automatic tuner might make me lazy. ;-) I'm not worried about the low power either. I think having a high powered radio for my first rig would make me lazy. It would be easier for me to pump out wattage rather than fine tune my antenna. Besides that, when I am ready for higher power, I could add an amplifier. One thing at a time. ;-) Jim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHCO7wQuDJiZ/QrH0RAjcNAJ0etx9PNmIN3CW7I/oVQSzIKKgRUgCeIMTm ZKZCaUZJ2fbyliCeuMmHlFE= =oTUH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "James Barrett" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bob Bob wrote: Hi Jim I haven't seen a simple answer to your question yet! I don't mind all the different answers. It actually helps me to figure out what it's all about. I think my first misunderstanding about the Yaesu was that in reading the owner's manual, I had been expecting it to have a built-in automatic tuner (the Icom 703+ has one). When I read about the VHF antenna which comes with the radio it made it seem like I could use it on all bands.. of course I misunderstood what I was reading. I understand now that it does not have a built in tuner, and I would either have to use an external tuner or use a resonant antenna for whichever band I was going to use. At any rate, if I go with the Yaesu, one benefit would be that I would gain experience in building and tuning my own antennas. That is something I am interested in. Having an automatic tuner might make me lazy. ;-) There is nothing to keep you from doing this with any radio. I'm not worried about the low power either. I think having a high powered radio for my first rig would make me lazy. It would be easier for me to pump out wattage rather than fine tune my antenna. Besides that, when I am ready for higher power, I could add an amplifier. One thing at a time. ;-) Unless you have experience with QRP, you might find this an exercise in frustration. If you don't want to spend the money now, I would look for a deal on a used 100W rig. There is not much to choose from in amplifiers (other than VHF/UHF) that don't require 100W of drive. Tam/WB2TT Jim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHCO7wQuDJiZ/QrH0RAjcNAJ0etx9PNmIN3CW7I/oVQSzIKKgRUgCeIMTm ZKZCaUZJ2fbyliCeuMmHlFE= =oTUH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim
I agree with Tam. It is way more cost effective to buy a 2nd hand 100W radio than a new low power one. It's easy to reduce output power when you want to. The only reason I would go so low is if I ever wanted to run it backpack portable. Compare some prices! You will then be able to afford an ATU as well! Cheers Bob VK2YQA Tam/WB2TT wrote: Unless you have experience with QRP, you might find this an exercise in frustration. If you don't want to spend the money now, I would look for a deal on a used 100W rig. There is not much to choose from in amplifiers (other than VHF/UHF) that don't require 100W of drive. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 I just found this on the yaesu web site. They offer an antenna called the ATAS-25. It appears to be an antenna that you can easily tune. The instructions say to use the SWR meter (I think it has one built in) in CW mode to test the antenna, and make adjustments to it as needed. Jim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHCPi/QuDJiZ/QrH0RAqB1AJ9+9Gdg1YC1QqDauknncEzj+2HPUQCgrmpB B1oaucpbFeMy/iuBJJIgW/s= =k++R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:05:01 -0400, James Barrett
wrote: I read some reviews on eHam too, and it almost sounds like the FT-817ND doesn't need a tuner.. I'm confused. Any opinions would be helpful. Hi Jim, I think the confusion of needing no tuner is that you won't burn out the finals driving a short or an open (you don't have enough power to light a candle). Of course, this is no recommendation for a successful QSO, but matching from the manufacturer's point of view is about keeping your rig out of their repair shop (where they risk having a mad customer for any of a number of reasons). Second, automatic tuners in the bigger, 100W units, don't work all that well with random wire. Ultimately you are building the SAME resonant antenna for both rigs for the SAME reason = getting all the power to radiate. Moral: build/buy an external tuner. Third, as to power, learn all about electronics and build yourself a 100W linear. Cheaper than a 1KW linear and you may even find/rob a 100W amplifier deck from a dead HF rig at a swap meet. Their input is typically in the 1 to 2 Watt range and this design (the deck) has been around for three decades (which means if you steal ANY schematic from the equipment from ANY manufacturer for the past 30 years, you stand a good chance of having the complete design already done with a complete and mud-ordinary parts list). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: FT-817ND - DSP 9+ - LDG QRP Tuner | Swap | |||
Yaesu FT-817ND and ACC for Trade | Swap | |||
Yaesu FT-817ND | Dx |