Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vito" wrote in message ... "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:03:50 -0600, "Drink" wrote: I've been studying for my Extra Class ..... Hi OM, Relieve the stress and just take the test. You don't need a perfect score to pass. If you don't pass, take it again..... Try a practice exam at www.qrz.com. Understanding the answers is all well and good but more and more the "right" answer depends on FCC and/or ARRL fiat rather than physics. Nor is that unreasonable. Why require theory if everybody is an appliance ham anyway? The times, they are a changing and nobody can stop it. 73, K3DWW Well the hams may end up being "appliance operators" but they will each be responsible for the quality of signal that there station puts out. The FCC will not accept the excuse that one doesn't know how to address problems with their station signal whether or not the material remains on the test. They will continue to require that you comply with the rules and thus it's a good idea to actually learn and understand the material. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How can you be so elitist as to expect anyone to learn anything, is it not
sufficient that they want it? It's simply is not fair for someone to obtain somethng through effort, if you have it and I want it, I deserve it with no additional effort on my part. It is Kenwood, Icom or whatever's responsibility that my station works correctly. I can't be bothered by some stupid rules or code as in inhibits my right to everything. Member "No code, No test, Know Nothing International" "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message .com... Well the hams may end up being "appliance operators" but they will each be responsible for the quality of signal that there station puts out. The FCC will not accept the excuse that one doesn't know how to address problems with their station signal whether or not the material remains on the test. They will continue to require that you comply with the rules and thus it's a good idea to actually learn and understand the material. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() W4JLE wrote: How can you be so elitist as to expect anyone to learn anything, is it not sufficient that they want it? It's simply is not fair for someone to obtain somethng through effort, if you have it and I want it, I deserve it with no additional effort on my part. It is Kenwood, Icom or whatever's responsibility that my station works correctly. I can't be bothered by some stupid rules or code as in inhibits my right to everything. Member "No code, No test, Know Nothing International" Remember, you can't make things simple enough for everyone! - Mike KB3EIA - |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
W4JLE w4jle(remove to wrote:
[snippety] It is Kenwood, Icom or whatever's responsibility that my station works correctly. I can't be bothered by some stupid rules or code as in inhibits my right to everything. Member "No code, No test, Know Nothing International" I think you forgot the dws and /dws[1] tags on your post. [1] "dripping with sarcasm" and "stop dripping with sarcasm" -- Mike Andrews Tired old sysadmin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna |