John Smith wrote:
Jimmie D wrote:

...
Hi Gene, From the data posted by Vincent I dont think he is trying to be a
fraud. Maybe he is just unaware that the data he is discovering about short
antennas is about 70 or 80 years old. That would be giving him the benifit
of the doubt.

Jimmie



Post that 70-80 year old EZNEC mockup you are familiar with and we'll
check it out ...

JS

I dont have EZNEC, But I will trust you if you care to model a 1/4wl
monopole and compare it to an 1/8wl monople operating against a
perfect counterpoise. Fine enginneer that Art is he should have no
trouble in calculating field intensity at a receiving antenna 1 mile
away. I have total respect for the integrity of your work as long as
you show your math.


Jimmie