Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Oct, 11:12, "Jimmie D" wrote:
"Gene Fuller" wrote in message ... art wrote: On 9 Oct, 19:35, John Smith wrote: art wrote: www.newswise.com/articles/view/532935 Yeah, ole' Robert Vincent is a sore spot in the NG, I'd imagine. Made A$$'es out of all the "experts" and continues to do so ... sometimes there is real justice. Regards, JS Yup, the experts were not experts after all just phony's. Ofcourse we now have to wait for comments like " I knew that all the time", "I have been using that method for years", "that was invented by Mantovani a hundred yeard ago but he just didn't get around to printing it" Art The patent, US 7187335, is a real hoot. I especially like the part where he describes doubling the bandwidth by adding a parasitic winding intertwined with the base coil helix. Do you suppose his antenna is in equilibrium? Could proper application of Artsian-Gaussian theory improve it even more? ![]() 73, Gene W4SZ Hi Gene, From the data posted by Vincent I dont think he is trying to be a fraud. Maybe he is just unaware that the data he is discovering about short antennas is about 70 or 80 years old. That would be giving him the benifit of the doubt. Jimmie- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well said Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|