Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "art" wrote in message oups.com... If he understood Gaussian law then he could have made the Gaussian antenna which requires an element in equilibrium which means a FULL WAVELENGTH. I know you dislike the meaning of the term equilibrium b ut here it is indispesable. you contradict yourself now... you told us before that you used half wavelength elements for you 'gaussian' antenna???? Even without the knoweledge of Gauss he came very close to Gauss or the biggest discovery of the century If one winds a half wave length in a clockwise direction starting at the top going down and then repeating with another halfwave length but winding it in a counterclockwise direction( preferably winding both wires at the same time) and then joining together the two wires at the top he would then have a copy of my Gaussian antenna. Another contradiction. earlier you have said that the 'gaussian' elements were simple straight halfwave elements???? and ONE MORE TIME.... define 'equilibrium'. write the equations. just what is in 'equilibrium' with what?? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|