Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 18th 07, 10:01 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default New antenna

On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:03:55 -0700, art wrote:

the rule for the most efficient
radiation
is that "if a radiating element is resonant and in equilibrium it can
be of any shape, size or
elevation".


Hmmm, take the cover off any HF tube transmitter. It has an element
that is resonant - called the Plate Load. It is of any shape. It
must be quiting Librium. It is of any size. It is at some elevation
(you may raise the transmitter if you wish).

Yet and all, it makes one of the worst HF antennas ever to come down
the pike in the past three centuries or two millenniums.

We can all agree that if Arthur had any pride in his theory, he
wouldn't be building antennas having already satisfied EVERY proviso
with a Plate Load.

Yet that is ignored by the so called experts of the
amateur ranks.


EVERY amateur can test this one idea. Most who did, abandoned this
theory immediately as obviously deeply inferior.

No experts were called, implicated, consulted, used or maimed in the
making of this announcement - except, possibly, the previous two
correspondents. Torts limitations have capped their flamboyant claims
to the value of their posts: 2¢ (adjusted for inflation equal only to
the Weimar Republic Mark).

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #2   Report Post  
Old October 18th 07, 10:33 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default New antenna

On 18 Oct, 14:01, Richard Clark wrote:
snip

We can all agree that if Arthur had any pride in his theory, he
wouldn't be building antennas having already satisfied EVERY proviso
with a Plate Load.

Yet that is ignored by the so called experts of the
amateur ranks.


EVERY amateur can test this one idea. Most who did, abandoned this
theory immediately as obviously deeply inferior.


73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


You make my point. I have a lot of pride in my findings and
as yet no amateur has made it otherwise they would be shouting
from the roof tops. There are many so called experts who write
about antennas, some even have written books no less but they
get so upset when others write things down for antennas I
suppose because they have gone thru life without making one experiment
relying on their superior brain power so they do not have to lift a
finger.
If they choose not to agree then all others are frauds no less.
Kudos to JS he actually made a Vincent antenna for himself to prove
things.
Kudo's to those who have AO optimisers where they can model these
things for themselves.
Yes a optimizer bound by Maxwell's rules produces the Gaussian
radiators if you ask for
arrays, a radiator or maximum polarity radiation and without tieing it
down to a planar form.
And yes, all other antenna programs verify what the AO optimiser
program supplies.
I don't give one hoot for what you think about it since you do not
posses
an engineering degree and never writes anything of substance, where as
this discovery is all mine.
Oh and another thing I suspect Roys program would also verify the
results of the AO
optimizer just by duplicating the results given since he doesn't
posses any optimiser features.
Are we ready to say that if a antenna program based on Maxwell's rules
provides a gaussian antenna
then programs based on Maxwell follow the "garbage in garbage out
adage". Your choice
It is unusual for me to correspond to you because of your endless
lies and mockery of other people so make the best of this one as
it is going to be a long time.........

  #3   Report Post  
Old October 18th 07, 11:52 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default New antenna

On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:33:53 -0700, art wrote:

On 18 Oct, 14:01, Richard Clark wrote:
snip

We can all agree that if Arthur had any pride in his theory, he
wouldn't be building antennas having already satisfied EVERY proviso
with a Plate Load.

(We must all agree that Arthur, who faithfully and selectively quoted
me above, didn't actually read this line - did he?)

Yet that is ignored by the so called experts of the
amateur ranks.


EVERY amateur can test this one idea. Most who did, abandoned this
theory immediately as obviously deeply inferior.


73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


You make my point.


You have abandoned all antennas other than a Plate Load. (Delicious
irony for English Major versus the titan of random engineering.)

So, you made your point, I made your point, the point has been made.
Is it all down to waiting for the Load's white smoke to come out of
the Vatican chimney? An ecumenical QSO.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? RHF Shortwave 20 December 31st 05 09:41 PM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? David Shortwave 0 December 28th 05 05:24 AM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? David Shortwave 3 December 27th 05 09:59 PM
Single Wire Antenna {Longwire / Random Wire Antenna} - What To Use : Antenna Tuner? and/or Pre-Selector? David Shortwave 0 December 27th 05 09:18 PM
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) RHF Shortwave 15 September 13th 05 08:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017