On Oct 19, 9:27 pm, "Richard Fry"


The fundamentals of EM radiation are defined by natural laws, which even 50
years ago were rather well understood.

New antenna designs always will be possible, but all of them of necessity
must be based on, and follow natural law.

RF

Hi Richard

where is it shown that Art is not following natural
laws?. He has explained every step along the way
and I see no place where he has strayed from natural law.

Derek

"Derek" wrote
where is it shown that Art is not following natural
laws?. He has explained every step along the way
and I see no place where he has strayed from natural law.
___________

Below from earlier in this thread (quoting Art)...

" I say again, one must have equilibrium for maximum efficiency and
that requires a full wave length radiator and at the same time holding
to the LC ratio for that length. "

Natural law, and decades of field experience with commercial antenna
systems do not support these beliefs.

RF

This reminds me of the "E H " antenna spiel.
"First we modify Maxwell's equations."

hahahahahahahahahahahaha

73
H., NQ5H


"Richard Fry" wrote in message
...
"Derek" wrote
where is it shown that Art is not following natural
laws?. He has explained every step along the way
and I see no place where he has strayed from natural law.
___________

Below from earlier in this thread (quoting Art)...

" I say again, one must have equilibrium for maximum efficiency and
that requires a full wave length radiator and at the same time holding
to the LC ratio for that length. "

Natural law, and decades of field experience with commercial antenna
systems do not support these beliefs.

RF