| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
October 27th 07, 05:15 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST
Art Clemons wrote:
"Would not a more reasonable approach be to use something like a Wattmeter and get the antenna resonant?" You have a point. The wattmeter was on the input to the tuner and we don`t know what the tuner`s loss is. If the loss is negligible, everything should be OK, and "the input power was the same on each antenna." Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
|
#2
October 28th 07, 12:34 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST
On Oct 27, 12:15 am, (Richard Harrison)
wrote: Art Clemons wrote: "Would not a more reasonable approach be to use something like a Wattmeter and get the antenna resonant?" You have a point. The wattmeter was on the input to the tuner and we don`t know what the tuner`s loss is. If the loss is negligible, everything should be OK, and "the input power was the same on each antenna." Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI I received back a fairly detailed email from the QST editor involved... I will reply to him next week... I will incorporate some of the comments on here - with attribution to the author(s).. Everything (except private comments) will be shared here... Right now, back to the inhumane QRN on 80 meter cqww... denny / k8do |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A comparison of the DA100E with the AmRad active antennas. | Shortwave | |||
| E-bay...Are we supposed to believe everything? | Shortwave | |||
| Viking antennas by Childs Electronics ? Comparison ? | CB | |||
| Comparison of three indoor active antennas | Shortwave | |||
| mobile antenna impedance comparison | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
