Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Declaring a vehicle to be "ground" doesn't give it magic properties. It's a conductor, just like the antenna. Exactly the same current that flows upward on your antenna flows downward along your vehicle. The vehicle and "antenna" comprise an asymmetrical dipole, and neither half is inherently more or less important than the other. Roy Lewallen, W7EL That is rather simplistic and not reality reflecting explanation. Like saying that ground plane, vertical antenna is a dipole. Vehicle body represents "ground plane" similar to two or more radials. The current flows along the surface of the vehicle, just as along the more elaborate ground plane consisting of more than say 8 radials. Cancellation of current along the body happens, just like in opposite radials in GP. Radiation pattern is formed between the RADIATOR (whip) and GROUND PLANE (vehicle body). Additional effect is that vehicle "ground plane" is capacitively coupled to the ground and this is reflected in changes in efficiency depending on the surroundings ground conditions (salty, wet ground, reinforced concrete bridges, etc.) As far as I understand, dipole refers to dual pole antenna with symmetrical current distribution. Vertical antenna mounted on conducting body of vehicle has current distribution in the "other pole" far from symmetrical. This can be seen in modeling in EZNEC. Try to compare vertical whip mounted on vehicle, with dipole that has one leg horizontal and you will see the difference, far from "nice dipole" antenna. So as soon as we have more than one radial, and some (horizontal) cancellation is happening it ain't no dipole. It is monopole forming vertical pattern against the ground plane (radials, vehicle body). That's the way I understand it, without involving photons, Gaussss and other farticles :-) 73 Yuri, K3BU |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A comparison of the DA100E with the AmRad active antennas. | Shortwave | |||
E-bay...Are we supposed to believe everything? | Shortwave | |||
Viking antennas by Childs Electronics ? Comparison ? | CB | |||
Comparison of three indoor active antennas | Shortwave | |||
mobile antenna impedance comparison | Antenna |