LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old November 2nd 07, 12:00 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 170
Default Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST


"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message
...

Declaring a vehicle to be "ground" doesn't give it magic properties. It's
a conductor, just like the antenna. Exactly the same current that flows
upward on your antenna flows downward along your vehicle. The vehicle and
"antenna" comprise an asymmetrical dipole, and neither half is inherently
more or less important than the other.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL



That is rather simplistic and not reality reflecting explanation.
Like saying that ground plane, vertical antenna is a dipole.
Vehicle body represents "ground plane" similar to two or more radials. The
current flows along the surface of the vehicle, just as along the more
elaborate ground plane consisting of more than say 8 radials. Cancellation
of current along the body happens, just like in opposite radials in GP.
Radiation pattern is formed between the RADIATOR (whip) and GROUND PLANE
(vehicle body).
Additional effect is that vehicle "ground plane" is capacitively coupled to
the ground and this is reflected in changes in efficiency depending on the
surroundings ground conditions (salty, wet ground, reinforced concrete
bridges, etc.)

As far as I understand, dipole refers to dual pole antenna with symmetrical
current distribution. Vertical antenna mounted on conducting body of vehicle
has current distribution in the "other pole" far from symmetrical. This can
be seen in modeling in EZNEC. Try to compare vertical whip mounted on
vehicle, with dipole that has one leg horizontal and you will see the
difference, far from "nice dipole" antenna.

So as soon as we have more than one radial, and some (horizontal)
cancellation is happening it ain't no dipole. It is monopole forming
vertical pattern against the ground plane (radials, vehicle body).

That's the way I understand it, without involving photons, Gaussss and other
farticles :-)

73 Yuri, K3BU


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A comparison of the DA100E with the AmRad active antennas. [email protected] Shortwave 0 August 4th 05 03:23 PM
E-bay...Are we supposed to believe everything? Frank Bals Shortwave 6 March 20th 05 10:59 PM
Viking antennas by Childs Electronics ? Comparison ? Iowa883 CB 1 February 12th 05 04:46 AM
Comparison of three indoor active antennas Steve Shortwave 0 July 5th 04 07:42 PM
mobile antenna impedance comparison H. Adam Stevens, NQ5H Antenna 23 January 22nd 04 10:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017