Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 6, 4:27 pm, (Rick) wrote:
So my conclusion is that even though the vertical might have the low angle pattern, the losses in the soil do not allow the advantages to be realized. Phased arrays of similar antennas over lossy soil may show the nice pattern and f/b but the absolute value of gain expected may not be realized. 73 Rick K2XT I saw pretty much the same thing. If you want truly top notch performance ground mounted, you have to lay out the wire. Well, unless you are at the beach or something.. :/ I ran mostly 40m using full size verticals, and even with 32 full length radials, I saw mediocre results at best. And I'm on a high rated ground as far as conductivity. When I elevated the antenna to 36 ft at the base is when I finally saw decent performance. Of course, it's not going to be easy to run a full size elevated ground plane on 80m.. ![]() The only way you are going to see the performance you should is by coughing up more wire. ![]() But according to some I read, 60 will do the trick rather than having to do the full blown 120.. Not a whole lot of difference between the two in theory. Even elevated at 1/8 wave, a ground plane needs appx sixty radials to equal a ground plane at 1/2 wave , using four radials. And about 120 may well be needed if you really want to equal the losses of the high ground plane. Ground clutter can be another problem, although usually not huge. But, it's just another reason why I prefer an elevated vertical if at all possible. As far as the modeling, I have to adjust the programs to "very good" ground to have it equal what I see in the real world at this QTH. If they are set to default "average" ground, the verticals get shortchanged. ![]() But on the other hand, maybe that just tells me the ground here is better than average, which actually it is... :/ I'm on the gulf coast, and most of the area rates a "30" on the conductivity maps. Thats no sure thing though.. Even though the ground is decent here, I never had better than mediocre results using a ground mounted vertical with 32 full length radials. I had very good results with the 36 ft high ground plane though. Was like day and night.. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Soil dielectric constand and conductivity for East Texas | Antenna | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical | Antenna | |||
Ground rods in rocky soil | Antenna |