Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Nov, 08:58, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Stefan Wolfe wrote: "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Stefan Wolfe wrote: In a resonant circuit containing R, L, and C, there most definitely is a time constant. Related to Q, it describes the time taken for the circuit to respond to a transient. The higher the Q, the longer the time constant, and the longer it takes the circuit to come to equilibrium after a step or sinusoid is applied, and to decay after it's removed. Failure to understand this has resulted in some very poorly designed audio filters for CW, among other things. But Roy, I must first clear up that we are talking about apples and oranges. I was referencing a sinusoidal source of a frequency that is resonant to the circuit. You are talking about a transient can be treated as the sum of sinusoids which will not be resonant at the same curcuit. I was also referring to the antenna as a L-C-R circuit that does have time constants along its lengths (but I was asking 'where' along the length) but as a whole system the time contant of the antenna, when fed by a signal at resonant frequency is zero. . . . You've lost me. What is the meaning of a "time constant" in steady state? What effect does it have? With a single frequency of constant amplitude, how could you tell whether a circuit, resonant or not, has a "time constant"? How could you measure it? The meaning of a time constant is not dependent upon steady state sinusoids or transient; it is merely a characteristic that dependent upon the *physical* properties of the components in the circuit. You know that of course. Let us say we design a power supply for use in consumer appliances. The power supply of course has a capacitor across line and neutral for EMI filtering, along with a bleeder resistor in parallel with this capacitor. Together, the bleeder resistor and phase/phase capacitor filter have a time constant. Now the time constant is meaningless with respect to steady state input voltage (other than wave shaping high f emi components) and with respect to transients. It is meaningful with respect to safety. If the consumer pulls out the plug, the bleeder resistor must discharge the phase to phase cap safely to prevent the consumer from being shocked when touching the L-N pins. The time constant RC in this case MUST meet certain specifications, that is it must be less than 0.1sec. That is essentially required legally (since standard compliance is compulsory). The time constant exists is chosen for a worse case value, ie that the consumer unplugs the power supply at the peak of the AC cycle. Actually, it is the DC discharge characteristic that we care about here. Transient suppression is not relevant nor is its ability to shape the incoming sinusoid.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I read thru all and it wasn't until thelast sentence did you state anything that is relevent. The Dc discharge characteristic when the terminals are shorted. Discouting the spike at the beginning the discharge is dependent on the size of the vessel and restrictions applied by the circuit. The larger the vessel the sharper the curve with respect to time. This goes for both the inductance and the capacitance and it is only the losses which are small take away the perpetual motion. I suggest you go to google and look up a "tank circuit" where they will I am sure take you thru the phase changes that create the pendulum like action. But then you knew that all along, anything but review the math. Hot air once again. Why not discuss it with the broadcast engineer with his long time service at switching on a transmitter every morning,every day plus turn the lights out. As Vanna White would say in defence of her salary status You have to know the alphabet Art Art |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"art" wrote
Why not discuss it with the broadcast engineer with his long time service at switching on a transmitter every morning, every day plus turn the lights out. __________ As I told you once already, the last 30 years of my professional background was in the field and applications engineering groups of the two largest designers/manufacturers of broadcast radio and television transmitter and antenna systems in the US: RCA and Harris. My experience working directly for broadcast stations was early in my career, including with a stint at WJR, a 50 kW, non-directional AM station using a 195° monopole (700 ft high). And what is your commercial experience in the field of r-f systems? RF |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Fry" wrote in message And what is your commercial experience in the field of r-f systems? RF Richard: Concerning Art's experience with RF energy, I believe that he often microwaves with the door open. Mike W5CHR |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Distributed capacitance effects Q? | Antenna | |||
"On Target" now being distributed | Shortwave | |||
Capacitance Meter ???? | Homebrew | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna |