Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 05:29:16 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote: But, Mark, you are neglecting physical efficiency. On 18 Feb 2004 22:15:35 -0800, (Mark Keith) wrote: After all, it's going to have to come up an average of 4 S units "average report given to me over the 36 ft dipole" to a long DX haul site to do it. "IE: TX to VK land". Hi Mark, The Flat Earth Socialists invent new forms of "efficiency" to argue against success. With their logic, a dummy load is the world's best antenna (and quiet too). The are obviously seduced by their own math models where less current emerges from a resistor than goes in. ;-) 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Want K2BT "Ham Radio" articles on phasing verticals | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |