Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote in message ...
Richard Clark wrote: Mark's experience eclipses this nonsense of Flat Earth Socialist rhetoric. Mark hasn't tried a 130 foot dipole on 10m at the same height as his vertical in the direction of one of the four 11 dBi at 7 deg lobes. Even with a perfect ground, his vertical tops out at about 5 dBi, a full s-unit below the dipole's best lobes. Actually, I have tried it on 10m and most other bands. "I do have 80m dipoles". But no, the dipole never beat the 5/8 GP. I've also tried a 40m dipole. Flat Earth thinking equates to asserting that a vertical monopole will beat a +11 dBi beam (or lobe). It's like when I was out camping using a ladder line fed 80m, 130 ft dipole. I tried it on ten. It was pathetic due to the overly high takeoff angles. I'm talking terrible. We couldn't contact anyone, although we could hear a few. Bad...And yes, when modeled, that antenna had the same gain you claim with yours, being it was exactly the same. Lamest 10m antenna I ever used. My whip on the car beat it like a lost step child. In any direction. Like I said, gain numbers don't always tell it all. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Want K2BT "Ham Radio" articles on phasing verticals | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |