Does phasing verticals work better than dipole?

#26

February 21st 04, 06:01 AM

Cecil Moore

Posts: n/a

Mark Keith wrote:
The dipole we used was probably 15-20 ft off the ground.

If you had buried it, you could report even worse performance. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole.	Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA	Antenna	8	February 24th 11 11:22 PM
Want K2BT "Ham Radio" articles on phasing verticals	DOUGLAS SNOWDEN	Antenna	1	February 17th 04 02:43 AM
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet	Dick	Antenna	2	February 6th 04 09:55 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna	Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA	Antenna	12	October 16th 03 08:44 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:48 AM.

Menu

About Us