| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark Keith wrote:
If you are using the vertical for long haul, the increased received noise is a non issue. Actually, that's when an s-7 noise level is the biggest issue. Most long haul signals are below s-7. The signals will override the noise. IE: the noise might be 2 s units higher, but the signal increase over the low dipole will likely be more than that. The vertical still wins overall. Bottom line: Verticals are essentially useless in Madisonville, TX and, to the best of my knowledge, all hams here are forced to use horizontally polarized antennas. Anyone who wants a nice 33 foot long vertical, come on over and haul it away for free. Drilling out the pop rivets allows collapsing it to six feet long. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Want K2BT "Ham Radio" articles on phasing verticals | Antenna | |||
| 40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||