Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil
I am talking about the half power thingy with respect to a series circuit of which a antenna is designed around. Reg politely made a separate thread on a specific part of that thread which referred to impedance, presumably because Q was being bandied about where he thought probably it was irelevant. Am I wrong to think that because a different thread was not made the impedance question and amplifiers was relavent and somebody was not being destructive/impolite? Now to your pont of what is the kicker...a normal dipole cannot receive Class-C (non linear signals)"? Having being told about this thing that somebody read somewhere, where is it leading to? Seems like I entered a class on engineering and after 5 minuites I am wondering what sort of professor I had that not only just read books out loud for his money but thought it was O.K. to read from a wood working book. Can't we assume that a antenna is a closed series circuit containing only passive items ? If you have in mind that we must we consider an antena as a Class something or other amplifier when determining its impedance then I am hopelessly lost in a thread that can only end up nasty like some others did and drive some more people away because somebody wanted to play games of obstruction with the intent to annoy. Now I see that somebody decided to change this thread heading instead of starting a new thread . Now we are talking about RMS meters and how they can be used ? Are we talking digital or analogue, hand held or otherwise, high enough accuracy to satisfy all ( Nah that is asking to much) Well it is an antenna newsgroup so it must radiate , somebody read it in a book and assumes that all are unaware of it so he wishes to describe it so others can make sense of what he read and why he read it! Regards Art I am not pointing the finger at you Cecil, I have no idea who the culprit is or what his intent is. ?Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... aunwin wrote: The half power thingy I presume is understood by all so IS something very exciting to be revealed that shows that the dipole is really an efficient radiator after all, but only if you put a class C amplifier on it? Art, I assume you know that Class-C amplifiers are not usually used for SSB since they are not linear for SSB. The basic confusion is between linear systems and non-linear systems. If the amplifying device (singular) conducts over the entire 360 degrees of an RF cycle and the output waveform is a reasonable copy of the input waveform, then that device is said to be linear. If you have two amplifying devices operating in anything except Class-A operation, the output of each individual device is not linear. That's the kicker. The "two non-linear device" option is not available at the antenna for receiving purposes. A normal dipole cannot receive Class-C (non-linear) signals. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |