Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Richard Clark wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: I don't think anyone is stupid enough to assert that the phase shift in a capacitor is the same as it is in the absence of any physical impedance discontinuity. Capacitance is not obtained in a physical impedance discontinuity? or is it: You missed the point. A terminating capacitor is a two terminal network. The point where two pieces of feedline are connected is a four-terminal network. A two-terminal network is different from a four-terminal network. Cecil, This appears to be an unusual definition. How does the "point where two pieces of feedline are connected" become a four-terminal network? One typically thinks of a four-terminal network as having inputs and outputs, with something between. What is that "something between" in the case of two connected feedlines? In your models this "something" seems to have no dimensions and no characteristics other than a phase shift. Are you suggesting that every simple connection is now a four-terminal network? Do all of the textbooks need to be re-written? 73, Gene W4SZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|