Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
I don't blame you for trying your best to suppress the
technical facts by hiding things in a black box

If that is what you wish to believe, then there is no way to convince
you otherwise.

It's not what I believe, Ian, it is what you did right
here in front of God and everybody. There was absolutely
no reason to introduce a black box concept unless you
were trying to hide something embarrassing inside the
black box. That embarrassing something is obviously
the phase shift at an impedance discontinuity which you
are trying your best to suppress.

but now the
whole world is aware of your attempted suppression of
technical facts, not a good reputation to have for a technical
editor.

So you accuse; but I'm content to let everyone else be the judge.

If you aren't trying to suppress technical facts, then
please perform the math on my other thread,
"Please verify (or disprove)" and post your results
whether or not they agree with my results. By refusing
to respond, you will be enforcing my worst fears about
your ulterior motives, i.e. to suppress the technical
facts about that phase shift.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com