Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Peake wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: Alan Peake wrote: If one were to find lossless material (superconductors?) for the short antenna and it's corresponding matching network, what would happen as the antenna became shorter and shorter compared with the half-wave dipole? Would it simply approach an isotropic radiator? Alan No. The answer can be found in any antenna textbook, ... etc. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Thanks Roy. Unfortunately, since I retired, I no longer have access to Jasik, Kraus etc. So, thanks for the answer. I should have realised that a dipole of any length is still a dipole and as such will not radiate off it's ends. Mind you, Eznec shows the average dipole, less than half-wave above ground, goes pretty close to an isotropic radiator for all practical purposes ![]() Alan --------------- You appear to be extrapolating, if I see this correctly, that since all of the radiation is believed to come from one end of the dipole, then the rest of the antenna is merely acting as the necessary reactances and resistance needed to obtain the proper feedpoint impedance at a given frequency. True? Following that line of reasoning, if the need for the aggregate reactances/resistances can be eliminated via superconducting elements, one will have just a single point source of radiation. Or, what is commonly known as an isotropic radiator. I suspect that the plasma antenna fellows are contemplating this too. Ed, NM2K |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Nutty Antenna Idea -- Complete with Rhetorical Questions | Antenna | |||
Novel idea to turn an antenna | Antenna | |||
PC controlled reciever --- good idea? bad idea? or a just plain ugly one? | Scanner | |||
Weird antenna idea # 492 | Shortwave | |||
Opinions on Antenna | CB |