Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:36:59 -0500, Ed Cregger
wrote:

However, the point that the OP was trying to make was that it is likely
that superconductive radiating elements could establish the need for a
serious rethinking of antenna theory.

Hi Ed,

This is uni-dimensional thinking.

"A new breakfast cereal could establish the need for a serious
rethinking of sewing machine theory."

There are probably more things possible ("could establish") than time
to consider them - and probably on file pending patent. In that
sense, patent publishing could establish the need for a serious
rethinking of replacing burning oil for heat.

"Could establish" ...this could establish a new form of gaming
entertainment in this group. [and conforms to the usage of
self-referential claims]

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


--------------


So, rather than talk about the subject at hand, you would rather argue
about the technically poor writing style I employed. No thanks. G


Ed, NM2K

On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:34:50 -0500, Ed Cregger
wrote:

So, rather than talk about the subject at hand, you would rather argue
about the technically poor writing style I employed. No thanks. G

Hi Ed,

Talking already sputtered to the usual banal offerings so common with
the glazed-eye "what if we could only reach that golden city on the
hill," when I turned to commenting on the only thing left: the quality
of entertainment.

And going further with plasma antennas indeed! I remember plasma
speakers. We've had reports of burning water that would rescue us
from our dependence on Oil, -sigh- if only it didn't take more power
lighting up a bottle of Evian than you got out of it. But even
struggling through this doomed topic finds the cliff crumbling from
beneath its heels and its only hope is that the inventors are making a
living as scabs writing for daytime TV.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC