Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Ed Cregger wrote: However, the point that the OP was trying to make was that it is likely that superconductive radiating elements could establish the need for a serious rethinking of antenna theory. Actually, the only reason I mentioned superconductors (and thanks to Roy for putting me straight on that point!) was to examine a vanishingly short dipole without worrying about losses. I was not trying to alter existing antenna theory. Alan |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Nutty Antenna Idea -- Complete with Rhetorical Questions | Antenna | |||
Novel idea to turn an antenna | Antenna | |||
PC controlled reciever --- good idea? bad idea? or a just plain ugly one? | Scanner | |||
Weird antenna idea # 492 | Shortwave | |||
Opinions on Antenna | CB |