| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Dec 9, 8:50 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: If you do not have articulatable rules, then you do not even have a hypothesis, much less a theory. The theory I support is the distributed network model. It was invented before you or I were born. I do not have to defend it. If you disagree with it, you have to prove it false. A truly intriguing riposte: completely devoid of technical content, fails to further the discussion in any way, and yet deeply revealing about the thought processes at work. ....Keith |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
| Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
| Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
| The Tower still standing ???? | Antenna | |||
| Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna | |||