Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith Dysart wrote:
On Dec 9, 8:50 pm, Cecil Moore wrote: Keith Dysart wrote: If you do not have articulatable rules, then you do not even have a hypothesis, much less a theory. The theory I support is the distributed network model. It was invented before you or I were born. I do not have to defend it. If you disagree with it, you have to prove it false. A truly intriguing riposte: completely devoid of technical content, fails to further the discussion in any way, and yet deeply revealing about the thought processes at work. I'm disappointed in you, Keith. You appeared to be a reasonably intelligent person. Now that you have apparently performed my suggested experiment and know that I am right, you try to tuck your tail and run. I'm disapointed, but not surprised. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
The Tower still standing ???? | Antenna | |||
Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna |