| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Keith Dysart wrote:
So this means I could take an antenna element which is longer than 90 physical degrees, i.e. greater than 1/4WL, and with the appropriate matching network make a system that was 90 "electrical degrees". Of course, if you reverse the position of the 600 ohm line and 100 ohm line in the previous open-stub example, you will *lose* 8.3 degrees of phase shift at the impedance discontinuity. The transmission line will have to be physically 98.3 degrees long to get an electrical 90 degree phase shift. In like manner, if you have a straight (Hustler) base rod and make the rest of the antenna a helical coil with no stinger, you will wind up with a resonant mobile antenna that is more than 90 degrees long physically. If the Z0 of the base rod is 400 ohms, the Z0 of the loading coil is 4000 ohms, and the length of the base rod is 10 degrees, you will lose 9 degrees at the base rod-to-coil impedance discontinuity. The coil will need to be 89 degrees long, i.e. almost self-resonant. The antenna will be 99 degrees long physically. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
| Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
| Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
| The Tower still standing ???? | Antenna | |||
| Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna | |||