On 21 Dec, 16:23, Dave Heil wrote:
art wrote:
The main hang up in the trend to alternate aproaches to Newton such as
the relatavistic aproach is the inability to bring gravity into the
picture
based on the laws of Newton, and without gravity one cannot have a
unified
theory which is the holy grail of today. The theory provided presented
nothing
that combined electro magnetic forces with those of gravitation. The
article
presented provided two theories both of which depend on the other and
without
connection to any known principles of science. Thus without a solid
starting
point based on known science there cannot be a meaningful review and
would
never be accepted as such.( The theory has not qualified for a review
as yet)
My aproach is based on existing laws where equilibrium and gravity is
inherrent which is a solid starting point to provide a trail that
connects
to electro magnetic fields ( the stated parameters for a unified
theory
which presently has not been achieved).

I think you might be on to something, Art. *I believe gravity is at
work, lowering the radiation angle of my big tribander.

Everybody have a merry Xmas. And try not to be overbearing to those
gathered around you
Art

Why, Merry Christmas, Art. *

Because that was the beginning of what is good in this world.
Even his cruel death can not stop the ground swell.
Maybe the comming nuclear bomb on his birth place may bring
good reason for speedier change!




Those gathered around me (not because of
gravity, but because of common affection) will be quite safe as long as
none of them expounds on crackpot antenna theory.

Now I see why you upset people



Dave K8MN- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -