Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:43:14 -0600, "Crazy George"
wrote: Dave: Some of the huge commercial/government system rotators have built in torsion relief in the form of some sort of springing, but I don't think the smaller Yaesu have such. I would really be concerned with that much slack, as the larger the swing is, the more inertia the assembly builds up to pound the rotator internals into dust. Plus, if that model rotator has a positive 'brake' like the HAM series, then you are in a heap of trouble, as the brake has definitely failed. Best get it repaired before the spring winds. I think its supposed to have a brake. It is a Yeasu 800 DXA. Suspect loose mounting bolts - it hasn't been up so long for the rotator to simply fail, I think. The antenna is a Cubex 4 el, 5 band quad that is 7 sq ft and has a 30 ft boom. I think that rotator ought to handle it, as did the guy at Ham Radio Outlet. He actually talked me up to this one, when I was going to get a 450, but he pointed out the "K" factor, and how I needed the heavier rotator for that long boom. Something still isn't right, tho, I think. It could be the masting, tho. I have a 3: diameter piece that goes into the rotator and is "pinned" there by a bolt, as well as clamped, then it goes to a "jackshaft" that is a smaller, about 4' length of 1 3/4" stainless steel with 1 or 2 1/4" bolts thru it. That goes thru the 1 3/4" top section collar, then a 3" heavy aluminum mast slips over the stainless jackshaft and is secured with 2 quarter-inch bolts. There's probably some play in the bolts, but I don't think there's that much. Mounting bolts on the bottom of the rotator - I think those may be loose. Thanks for the info. Dave Head Dave |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave:
From that description, I suspect you are going to find all the bolt holes in the tubing elongated from torque. We usually drill slightly oversize holes for our fasteners, but in this high stress application, the holes should start undersize so the fasteners have to be driven in and are tight from the get-go. Also, it is necessary to select fasteners which do not have threads where they pass through the walls of the tubes. This is often the most difficult challenge. -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address "Dave Head" wrote in message ... snip It could be the masting, tho. I have a 3: diameter piece that goes into the rotator and is "pinned" there by a bolt, as well as clamped, then it goes to a "jackshaft" that is a smaller, about 4' length of 1 3/4" stainless steel with 1 or 2 1/4" bolts thru it. That goes thru the 1 3/4" top section collar, then a 3" heavy aluminum mast slips over the stainless jackshaft and is secured with 2 quarter-inch bolts. There's probably some play in the bolts, but I don't think there's that much. Mounting bolts on the bottom of the rotator - I think those may be loose. Thanks for the info. Dave Head Dave |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:46:54 -0600, "Crazy George"
wrote: Dave: From that description, I suspect you are going to find all the bolt holes in the tubing elongated from torque. We usually drill slightly oversize holes for our fasteners, but in this high stress application, the holes should start undersize so the fasteners have to be driven in and are tight from the get-go. Also, it is necessary to select fasteners which do not have threads where they pass through the walls of the tubes. This is often the most difficult challenge. That is certainly worth a suspicion or two. I had it tilted over a couple months ago, after being up for a while, and inspected the bolts and found no wear. The whole assembly was not "tight" at that time either, and I think it was the rotor that had the play. But I'll tilt it over again and go through it all. Thanks, Dave Head K8DH |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That was it. There is a 2" aluminum tube over a 1 1/4" stainless steel
"jackshaft". It's held with two 1/4" bolts. Holes thru aluminum tube were elongated. Drilled to 3/8". Unfortunately, these aren't perfectly round, either, since I drilled 'em with a hand drill, but I'm hoping the torque I put on the 3/8" bolts will crush the aluminum tube into clamping on the stainless steel. We'll see. If not, I can drill more holes thru that assembly and put more bolts in. It seemed more solid, but next big wind, I'll have a look. Thanks again for the tip. Dave Head On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:46:54 -0600, "Crazy George" wrote: Dave: From that description, I suspect you are going to find all the bolt holes in the tubing elongated from torque. We usually drill slightly oversize holes for our fasteners, but in this high stress application, the holes should start undersize so the fasteners have to be driven in and are tight from the get-go. Also, it is necessary to select fasteners which do not have threads where they pass through the walls of the tubes. This is often the most difficult challenge. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave:
I've forgotten the exact construction you described, but I suspect you are going to have to increase the friction between the two tubes by splitting and clamping the outer. It sounds like the aluminum is simply too thin and too soft to withstand that kind of torque against a small diameter fastener. -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address "Dave Head" wrote in message ... That was it. There is a 2" aluminum tube over a 1 1/4" stainless steel "jackshaft". It's held with two 1/4" bolts. Holes thru aluminum tube were elongated. Drilled to 3/8". Unfortunately, these aren't perfectly round, either, since I drilled 'em with a hand drill, but I'm hoping the torque I put on the 3/8" bolts will crush the aluminum tube into clamping on the stainless steel. We'll see. If not, I can drill more holes thru that assembly and put more bolts in. It seemed more solid, but next big wind, I'll have a look. Thanks again for the tip. Dave Head On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:46:54 -0600, "Crazy George" wrote: Dave: From that description, I suspect you are going to find all the bolt holes in the tubing elongated from torque. We usually drill slightly oversize holes for our fasteners, but in this high stress application, the holes should start undersize so the fasteners have to be driven in and are tight from the get-go. Also, it is necessary to select fasteners which do not have threads where they pass through the walls of the tubes. This is often the most difficult challenge. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:10:56 -0600, "Crazy George"
wrote: Dave: I've forgotten the exact construction you described, but I suspect you are going to have to increase the friction between the two tubes by splitting and clamping the outer. It sounds like the aluminum is simply too thin and too soft to withstand that kind of torque against a small diameter fastener. Hi George, I took the antenna down last weekend (layed it over using the screw operated hinge base) and, after considering a few alternatives, and trying one unsuccessfully (new bolt hole - broke off bit), I drilled out the 2 1/4" bolt holes already there that were holding the hollow mast to the stainless steel shaft to 3/8". Installed 2 3/8" bolts and tightened them down very tightly. We've got a moderate wind right now, and the antenna is doing about 5 degrees of swing, so i think it helped. Will probably tilt it over in a couple weeks, drill some more 3/8" holes, and tighten them down smartly as well. BTW, for anyone with a quad that has "hose clamp" construction to hold the spreaders, it pays to retighten them. Nearly all of mine were stretched, and this antenna hasn't been up all that long - a few months. Dave Head K8DH |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTW, Dave: If you ever do disassemble that tubing over tubing joint, put a
solid block of something inside where the bolts go through. No tubing is strong enough to resist collapse when you tighten the through bolts enough. -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address "Dave Head" wrote in message ... snip We've got a moderate wind right now, and the antenna is doing about 5 degrees of swing, so i think it helped. Will probably tilt it over in a couple weeks, drill some more 3/8" holes, and tighten them down smartly as well. BTW, for anyone with a quad that has "hose clamp" construction to hold the spreaders, it pays to retighten them. Nearly all of mine were stretched, and this antenna hasn't been up all that long - a few months. Dave Head K8DH |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:24:59 -0600, "Crazy George"
wrote: BTW, Dave: If you ever do disassemble that tubing over tubing joint, put a solid block of something inside where the bolts go through. No tubing is strong enough to resist collapse when you tighten the through bolts enough. Hi George, No, its tubing over a solid steel shaft. The shaft isn't going to deform. The (aluminum) tubing, which is the 2" mast for the antenna, _will_ deform sufficiently to clamp onto the SS shaft. That seems to be retarding the excessive swinging in the wind now, but I think it might be made somewhat better. A couple more 3/8" bolts, in a couple new holes thru the assembly should help, I think. Dave Head |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |