Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 08, 02:47 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Magnetic fields

Some time ago JS woundered why we view the center of the earth is not
represented by force vectors
pushing OUT ie the equal and opposite reaction with respect to
gravity. This is a very insightful comment.
In fact the earth's ferrite mass center is represented by the magnetic
poles but because of the diagmagnetic content of the earth which
produces a weak magnetic field at right angles to a ferrite field we
have two magnetic axis at a distance from each other in our earth and
not just one.Thus somewhere, in between these two pole structures, we
have a point of equilibrium where the vector forces emminate from this
point in a outward direction. It is the position of the diagmatic pole
that provides the "curl" effect as seen when studying the radiator
vector format which is also responsible for the earth turning and the
circular rotation of a pendulum to which a radiator is often compared..
( By another name I believe this also describes the Corriolis effect)
One can stretch their minds and ponder on the effect of this
diamagnetic pole tho weak would have on a compass on opposite sides of
the earth, such as the Bermuda triangle and the area on the other side
of the earth but of to the side where Amelia Erhardt altered her
course for a unknown reason and disappeared.
Regards
Art
  #2   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 08, 06:51 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Magnetic fields

On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:47:59 -0800 (PST), art
wrote:

One can stretch their minds and ponder on the effect of this
diamagnetic pole tho weak would have on a compass on opposite sides of
the earth, such as the Bermuda triangle and the area on the other side
of the earth but of to the side where Amelia Erhardt altered her
course for a unknown reason and disappeared.


She dissappeared over the Perth Australia? I think if she looked out
the window, she would've figured out she wasn't lost at sea in the mid
Pacific. She could've probably hailed a cab using your navigational
skills.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #3   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 08, 08:35 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Magnetic fields

On 3 Jan, 10:51, Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:47:59 -0800 (PST), art
wrote:

One can stretch their minds and ponder on the effect of this
diamagnetic pole tho weak would have on a compass on opposite sides of
the earth, such as the Bermuda triangle and the area on the other side
of the earth but of to the side where Amelia Erhardt altered her
course for a unknown reason and disappeared.


She dissappeared over the Perth Australia? *I think if she looked out
the window, she would've figured out she wasn't lost at sea in the mid
Pacific. *She could've probably hailed a cab using your navigational
skills.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Again, no technical statements coming from your mouth only taunts.
Just shows what sort of individual you are, always taking a poke at
people
with none having technical content. I am beginning to think of you as
a
small person in stature with a big chip on your shoulder and a
slobbering mouth.
  #4   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 08, 08:45 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Magnetic fields

On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:35:56 -0800 (PST), art
wrote:

One can stretch their minds and ponder on the effect of this
diamagnetic pole tho weak would have on a compass on opposite sides of
the earth, such as the Bermuda triangle and the area on the other side
of the earth but of to the side where Amelia Erhardt altered her
course for a unknown reason and disappeared.


She dissappeared over the Perth Australia? *I think if she looked out
the window, she would've figured out she wasn't lost at sea in the mid
Pacific. *She could've probably hailed a cab using your navigational
skills.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Again, no technical statements


Oh most celebrated Prior Art, sir of infinite wisdom,

You write about geography and vectors.

The compass uses magnetism where you have curled the North Pole into
Bermuda.

The complex conjugate coordinates of Bermuda locate Perth Australia.

You have place Amelia at the conjugate North Pole by your navigational
skills [sic].

It stands to reason that modest cab fare would have gotten her to town
to allow her to announce she wasn't lost.

Vectors prove this and Gauss' law was used!

OH! I get it. You don't understand the technical part of "other side
of the earth" and complex conjugate. You only have a degree in
Spanner Engineering, not English, so your affliction is noted.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #5   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 08, 10:57 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 36
Default Magnetic fields

On Jan 4, 3:51 am, Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:47:59 -0800 (PST), art
wrote:

One can stretch their minds and ponder on the effect of this
diamagnetic pole tho weak would have on a compass on opposite sides of
the earth, such as the Bermuda triangle and the area on the other side
of the earth but of to the side where Amelia Erhardt altered her
course for a unknown reason and disappeared.


She dissappeared over the Perth Australia? I think if she looked out
the window, she would've figured out she wasn't lost at sea in the mid
Pacific. She could've probably hailed a cab using your navigational
skills.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC



She is believed to have gone down around 150 miles from Howland
Island in the Pacific, considering that is around 100 miles from the
equator I would say Art is pretty much on the money.

Derek


  #6   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 08, 11:07 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Magnetic fields

On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:57:55 -0800 (PST), Derek
wrote:

On Jan 4, 3:51 am, Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:47:59 -0800 (PST), art
wrote:

One can stretch their minds and ponder on the effect of this
diamagnetic pole tho weak would have on a compass on opposite sides of
the earth, such as the Bermuda triangle and the area on the other side
of the earth but of to the side where Amelia Erhardt altered her
course for a unknown reason and disappeared.


She dissappeared over the Perth Australia? I think if she looked out
the window, she would've figured out she wasn't lost at sea in the mid
Pacific. She could've probably hailed a cab using your navigational
skills.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC



She is believed to have gone down around 150 miles from Howland
Island in the Pacific, considering that is around 100 miles from the
equator I would say Art is pretty much on the money.


Bermuda (or even the Bermuda triangle) are both 3000 to 4000 kM from
the equator. The "other side of the earth" doesn't even come close to
Howland Island OR the Pacific!

How much money would you put down? Better yet, would you fly with Art
as navigator with his level of accurate map reading?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #7   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 08, 11:57 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 36
Default Magnetic fields

On Jan 4, 8:07 am, Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:57:55 -0800 (PST), Derek



wrote:
On Jan 4, 3:51 am, Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:47:59 -0800 (PST), art
wrote:


One can stretch their minds and ponder on the effect of this
diamagnetic pole tho weak would have on a compass on opposite sides of
the earth, such as the Bermuda triangle and the area on the other side
of the earth but of to the side where Amelia Erhardt altered her
course for a unknown reason and disappeared.


She dissappeared over the Perth Australia? I think if she looked out
the window, she would've figured out she wasn't lost at sea in the mid
Pacific. She could've probably hailed a cab using your navigational
skills.


73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


She is believed to have gone down around 150 miles from Howland
Island in the Pacific, considering that is around 100 miles from the
equator I would say Art is pretty much on the money.


Bermuda (or even the Bermuda triangle) are both 3000 to 4000 kM from
the equator. The "other side of the earth" doesn't even come close to
Howland Island OR the Pacific!

How much money would you put down? Better yet, would you fly with Art
as navigator with his level of accurate map reading?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC



But it is midway between the pole's on the other side of the
globe, which is more to the point of Art"s observation than your nit
picking.

Derek


  #8   Report Post  
Old January 4th 08, 12:25 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Magnetic fields

On 3 Jan, 15:57, Derek wrote:
On Jan 4, 8:07 am, Richard Clark wrote:





On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:57:55 -0800 (PST), Derek


wrote:
On Jan 4, 3:51 am, Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:47:59 -0800 (PST), art
wrote:


One can stretch their minds and ponder on the effect of this
diamagnetic pole tho weak would have on a compass on opposite sides of
the earth, such as the Bermuda triangle and the area on the other side
of the earth but of to the side where Amelia Erhardt altered her
course for a unknown reason and disappeared.


She dissappeared over the Perth Australia? *I think if she looked out
the window, she would've figured out she wasn't lost at sea in the mid
Pacific. *She could've probably hailed a cab using your navigational
skills.


73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


She is believed to have gone down around 150 miles from Howland
Island in the Pacific, considering that is around 100 miles from the
equator I would say Art is pretty much on the money.


Bermuda (or even the Bermuda triangle) are both 3000 to 4000 kM from
the equator. *The "other side of the earth" doesn't even come close to
Howland Island OR the Pacific!


How much money would you put down? *Better yet, would you fly with Art
as navigator with his level of accurate map reading?


73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


* * *But it is midway between the pole's on the other side of the
globe, which is more to the point of Art"s observation than your nit
picking.

*Derek- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Derek,
there are half a dozen more poles in our earth. Non ofcourse are as
strong as the ferrite pole but none pass thru the geometric center
of the earth so none can be exactly aligned on the opposite side of
the center point. These poles being made of natural diamagnetic
material
will have their lengths closest to the surface. All of course are
weak but all are weighted by the inverse square law. and aligned at
right angles to the ferrite pole ( north and south)So at certain
points on the surface of this earth all have a sweet spot for maximum
impact on a small piece of ferrite metal shimmering tho balanced on a
tiny pin when held in the hand.Don't take any notice of Richard he was
a swabby for most of his time and never got the chance to look out the
front of the ship.The bottom line is that he leaves nothing for you to
ponder on so why converse with him? Os an aside Derek the majority of
the earth's surface is covered by water which is diamagnetic. Both of
the areas that I pointed to lie in a vaste area of water. I am not
saying that compases malfunction in any way
but there are many aircrafts that have dissapeared in these areas
without trace. Makes you think doesn't it.
Regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ....XG (uk)
  #9   Report Post  
Old January 4th 08, 12:39 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Magnetic fields

On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:57:08 -0800 (PST), Derek
wrote:

But it is midway between the pole's on the other side of the
globe, which is more to the point of Art"s observation than your nit
picking.


Howland Island is near dead on the Equator, Bermuda is not even close.
Howland Island is near dead on the international date line, Bermuda is
nowhere near the Prime Meridian (opposite side). The opposite side of
the Earth for Howland Island would be south of the Ivory Coast in
Central-West Africa!

I have sailed in the Bermuda triangle many times (to no shocking
results) and Bermuda is three times closer to Boston than Quito
Ecuador which is midway between the poles.

Bermuda is also on 65 degrees West longitude, 180 degrees away (or 115
degrees East longitude) is the Indian Ocean, not the Pacific (and I've
been to both oceans too, crossing the full Pacific twice before I was
8 years old).

If nit picking amounts to a difference of 8000 kilometers, you must
have your money on one hell of a spread.

This doesn't bode well for Art's magnetic compass correction factors.
Even Gauss could tell the difference between the Indian Ocean and the
Pacific Ocean (and he would have looked at a globe first before
uttering this foolishness).

After all, this is really very simple stuff, but I guess you have to
have been there to appreciate these nit picking issues.

As for diamagnetic curls of the magnetic field, if no one responded to
this baloney, Art's ideas would die miserable solitary lives. Laughing
at them is about the best currency exchange he can hope for.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #10   Report Post  
Old January 7th 08, 11:47 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 61
Default Magnetic fields

In article
, art
wrote:

In fact the earth's ferrite mass center is represented by the magnetic
poles snip


"Ferrite mass center?" What are you talking about? Did you mean
"ferrous?" Ferrites have high electrical resistivity, not a property
that's usually associated with the hypothetical process(es) that gives
rise to the geomagnetic field. Sincerely, and 73s,

John Wood (Code 5550) e-mail:
Naval Research Laboratory
4555 Overlook Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20375-5337


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Working in strong 60Hz magnetic fields [email protected] Antenna 7 August 26th 06 03:10 AM
electric & magnetic fields ?? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 20 May 30th 05 09:56 PM
routing coax through strong DC magnetic fields Tracy Hall Antenna 13 May 28th 05 11:23 AM
Electric and Magnetic fields Toni Antenna 15 March 19th 04 03:50 PM
On address fields in AX.25 packets Odd Erling N. Eriksen Digital 4 November 24th 03 09:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017