Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:36:22 GMT, "Lee" wrote: As your interests span 20 down to 80 Only 20...... and Q intrudes into the bandwidth you desire at the longer wavelengths, then lowering Q would only drive down your efficiency and increase your complaint of getting out. It seems you are rapidly moving away from the loops. You might (if you can interpret the technical comments) try Arthur's contra-wound inventions. No doubt, they too would make good receive antennas, and the proximity of windings would lower Q, but this would come at a severe loss of gain and sensitivity. A receiver has enough gain to make up for this loss, but your transmitter is forever crippled with the introduction of both Ohmic loss and its loss boost due to tightly coupled currents. A larger diameter antenna is called for if you are sticking with loops, but that is probably unmanageable. 20 foot circumference is the longest magloop for 14megs operation!!! That is with 90% efficiency... Another breed of loop, the halfwave open loop allows you to build an omni horizontal polarized antenna in a small area, but we now enter into other issues you have not discussed. What resources, other than the tower, are available to you for supporting the linear loaded dipole you seek? None If you have four support points, your garden size is not unsuited to a full half wave design, there are no Q issues, no efficiency issues - except for matching to a 5 Ohm load. What can I say? Compromise antennas demand care and feeding. All i requested was a suitable design configuration for a linear loaded halfsize rotary dipole to go on top of the tower and my reasons why....... not a discussion on magloops .... I`ll go with the linear short 1/4 wave vertical layout for each leg of the dipole, where half the element is fed back on itself down to 6 inches from the ground ( or, in my case, to the mast ) with about 3 inch spacing of the element. You lost me entirely here. You want a horizontal dipole, and you will build a closely coupled vertical system that will rotate where half the element is within 6 inches of ground? Too much is left unsaid in this description. Is your tower guyed? Freestanding? You are using the mast (tower?) as half the antenna? Is the mast (tower?) grounded? This sounds like you are top feeding a vertical quarterwave open transmission line that rotates around one element. If so, your feed line is going to really become a nightmare of isolation. It will show varying horizontal/vertical directivity to a loss of 10dB in any direction - if you can match to the near short circuit conditions at the feed point. I`m not building a vertical !!! I don't think this is what you mean, but what you describe is vague. Probably. Imagine a half wave dipole with each leg folded back on itself effectively becoming half its original physical length but still the original electrical length, each leg is like a long thin letter `U` ..like a folded dipole that has been cut open circuit opposite the feed point...I shouldn`t have mentioned a vertical because it mis-lead you, it was meant just to describe the configuration of the dipole legs. Cheers. Len.......G6ZSG....... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Linear loaded 40 meter antenna question. | Antenna | |||
Cobra multiband dipole (linear loaded) help pse | Antenna | |||
1KW linear, what about nearby antennas? | Equipment | |||
Top loaded antennas - Lances | Antenna |