On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:11:09 GMT, Gene Fuller
wrote:

it is *so* much more authoritative when Xeroxed from
Cecil's own reference book.

Indeed, Gene,

Simply drilling into Cecil's corrupted Xerography always finds the
decay of his logic.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
Simply drilling into Cecil's corrupted Xerography always finds the
decay of his logic.

Richard, I admit that I am not perfect nor omniscient.
Will you admit that about yourself?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:12:00 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
Simply drilling into Cecil's corrupted Xerography always finds the
decay of his logic.

Richard, I admit that I am not perfect nor omniscient.
Will you admit that about yourself?

Hmm, I've been called a gay-wad, liar, a sailor, stupid, a cheat, a
vile lover of Shakespeare by any number of correspondents here
(including you) - your fawning need for sentimental admissions that
celebrities love to gush would be a pale shade of mauve in comparison.

Feel free to spit on me again at your convenience. ;-)

Wearing my Nor'wester in this wet climate since 1995,

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
Hmm, I've been called a gay-wad, liar, a sailor, stupid, a cheat, a
vile lover of Shakespeare by any number of correspondents here
(including you)

Sorry, that's a false statement. I have never called you a
gay-wad, a sailor, or a vile lover of Shakespeare. :-)

- your fawning need for sentimental admissions that celebrities
love to gush would be a pale shade of mauve in comparison.

So the answer to my question is "no", you are unwilling
to admit that you are not perfect nor omniscient. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com