Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Fuller wrote:
A suggestion. Read the IEEE Dictionary definition of "phasor" and report back to us if you think it is used to specify a direction in real space rather than phase space in the complex plane. I know the difference between phasors and vectors, Gene. Most of my textbooks represent the E and H fields as phasors, rather than vectors, by applying some logical boundary conditions to the vectors. The IEEE Dictionary says the E and H fields are represented as phasors. You seem to stand completely alone in your insistence that E and H fields cannot be represented as phasors. Would you mind providing one iota of proof for that assertion? Yes, the complex conjugate adjusts the phase portion of the wave description. However, it does not impact the real-space vector direction. Contrary to *all* of my references, you said the Poynting vector equals E x H* which apparently implies phasors rather than vectors. Would you care to explain your H* notation as it applies to real-space vectors? This is my question which you didn't answer - asked in different words. Exactly what is the complex conjugate of the vector that extends from 0,0,0 to 1,2,3? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing morphing to travelling waves, and other stupid notions | Antenna | |||
Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
The Tower still standing ???? | Antenna | |||
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... | Antenna | |||
Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna |