Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 25, 5:31*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: Check your answer by trying 100 kHz sinusoidal steady-state excitation. Good grief, Keith, get real. I guess I forgot to say the assertion was for an integer multiple of MHz. Yes, so it would seem. And that would seem to narrow the applicability of the original assertion rather severely. ...Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Convert reflection coefficient to Z | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Challenge Solved | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |