| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 26, 9:12*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: And that would seem to narrow the applicability of the original assertion rather severely. What do you know? It narrows it to amateur radio, the subject of this newsgroup. I was unaware that all Amateur transmission lines were a multiple of 1 wavelength long. Are you sure? To be entirely technically correct, since my assertion was about average powers, the example transmission line must be an integer multiple of 1/4 wavelength. I would suggest 1/2 wavelength. For an intuitive proof, consider a line with only forward power. Then think of a quarter wave section with a voltage peak in the middle. Then consider when the voltage 0 is in the middle. Lots more energy in the former than the latter. At 1/2 wavelength, the total energy in the line section is constant. ...Keith ...Keith |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Convert reflection coefficient to Z | Antenna | |||
| Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
| Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
| Reflection Coefficient Challenge Solved | Antenna | |||
| Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||