Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR
Cecil Moore wrote in news:mO0nj.4140$J41.257
@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net: Keith Dysart wrote: Not at all. The equations don't just stop working at 0 frequency. As a matter of fact, EM waves cannot exist without photons. There is zero wave activity at DC. Therefore, the forward power and reflected power is zero at DC steady-state. You really should try to stop thinking about photons for just a short while. Yep, you guys would like to sweep the technical knowledge from the field of optical physics and quantum electro- dynamics under the rug. One wonders why. Think of it as a long pulse. That should satisfy your need to have 'waves'. No, only photons will satisfy the definition of EM waves. There are no photons. There are no waves. There are no forward and reflected powers. There are no changing E-fields or H-fields. There is not even any movement of electrons associated with the source voltage. Food for thought! There is no such thing as DC! How’s that you say? You have to turn it on sometime and someday you may turn it off. There for, DC is just very low frequency AC. As another example of physics over thinking, I once had a physics professor describe in detail how an electric motor works using Quark physics. Very interesting but it has no practical value in using electric motors. Much like this long thread has nothing much to do with antennas. John Passaneau W3JXP |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR
"JOHN PASSANEAU" wrote in message ... There is no such thing as DC! How's that you say? You have to turn it on sometime and someday you may turn it off. There for, DC is just very low frequency AC. John Passaneau W3JXP That's false reasoning OM! Alternating current is not the same as discontinuous current. In the example you provide, a DC supply is either off or on; it does not reverse polarity! You do not make AC by switching on and off DC, even at 50 Hz (or your 60 Hz) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR
Suzy wrote:
"You do not make AC by switching on and off DC, even at 50 Hz (or your 60 Hz)" Not without inductance to provide the missing half cycle. Remember vibrator supplies and their solid-state equivalents? Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR
Suzy wrote:
"JOHN PASSANEAU" wrote in message ... There is no such thing as DC! How's that you say? You have to turn it on sometime and someday you may turn it off. There for, DC is just very low frequency AC. John Passaneau W3JXP That's false reasoning OM! Alternating current is not the same as discontinuous current. In the example you provide, a DC supply is either off or on; it does not reverse polarity! You do not make AC by switching on and off DC, even at 50 Hz (or your 60 Hz) But through the techniques of linear circuit analysis, we can split the pulsed DC into two components, a pure steady DC component and a symmetrical AC component. We can do two separate analyses with the two (AC and DC) excitations, and sum the results. The answer will be exactly the same as if we had done the calculations directly. One can then reasonably claim that the switched DC is the sum of an AC waveform and a pure DC component. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Convert reflection coefficient to Z | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Challenge Solved | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |