Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "AI4QJ" wrote in message ... "Mike Kaliski" wrote in message ... I personally feel (with very little justification) that wave particle duality breaks down if velocities exceed the speed of light and in the absence of one or the other, an object effectively disappears from our perception (and perhaps in effect from our universe). I believe that attempting to use FTL particles to explain certain phenomena, or more likely, using certain phenomena to theorize FTL paricle travel, is generally a practice reserved for non-physicists, science fiction writers and the like. Almost any true, practicing physicist will tell you that they and their colleagues don't believe in that stuff. Sorry, the universe may be interesting but it isn't THAT interesting. Too bad. The whole concept falls apart when causality comes into play. It is not even a paradox; it is worse than that. If I initiate an event to cause tachyons (or whatever you choose to call these FTL particles) to exist, then the particles must have existed (and must be observed) before that causation event which produced them was initiated. So what if you fully intend to cause the event and then change your mind at the last moment and decide not to cause it. How does your FTL particle know that you will not push the button so it knows to refrain from existing? So, although there is room in the special relativity theory for particles than can go no slower than light (the other side of the hyperbola), causation prohibits them from existing in the real world. If you were to believe in some supreme controlling authoritiy who could predict whenever you would push the button and make the particle appear, then it could be true. I am a bit too agnostic for that, however...it would be the only expalantion for the effect occuring prior to causation . This is reminiscent of the faith-based science that certain English majors use here when saying "just believe me, it's true; RF and acoustic waves interact. Why, it's a matter of public knowledge!". 73 de AI4QJ Sadly true! The problem with FTL is that causality is a big issue. Some would have us believe that the universe splits into two at every such event so that both alternatives exist. That really does make the mind boggle. My only suggestion to the causality problem is that time does not necessarily progress in the same manner at quantum scales as it appears to do for macro objects. It having been proven that the space time continuum is warped by gravitation, with even the earth having a measurable effect, it seems logical that time reversal or suspension at quantum scales would not be beyond probability. We just do not have the tools at present to prove any hypothesis, hence all the theories... :-) Cheers Mike G0ULI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radio Waves help!! | Antenna | |||
On the really Short Waves... | Shortwave | |||
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... | Antenna | |||
radio waves | Swap |