LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #32   Report Post  
Old February 11th 08, 01:29 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Waves vs Particles

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:45:25 -0500, "AI4QJ" wrote:

Correct. However, why don't you just leave it to Einstein who has
confirmed
this


By virtue of the impossibility of having a real situation of the square root
of a negative number, or time multiplied by "j" (SQRT -1), it is impossible
for v to exceed c in the real world.


Hi Dan,

Well, this is not confirmation merely exposition - and not even unique
to Einstein. It is demonstrated that v can exceed c (you have
replicated my observations there, so that cannot be in dispute), but
it cannot exceed 299,792,458 meters per second (which bares scant
relationship to complex numbers). This is not a remarkable
observation because neither can v exceed 300,000,000 meters per
second, nor 300,000,001 meters per second and so on.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radio Waves help!! DC Antenna 4 December 7th 06 12:49 AM
On the really Short Waves... Brian Hill Shortwave 15 April 18th 06 06:29 AM
Traveling Waves, Power Waves,..., Any Waves,... pez Antenna 10 December 13th 03 02:43 PM
radio waves Richard Cranium Swap 8 August 9th 03 11:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017