Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K7ITM wrote:
. . . But a better way to do a broadband vertical collinear is to feed several dipoles, stacked end-to-end (with some gap from one to the next), each fed with the same electrical length of feedline, with the far ends of all the feedlines paralleled. If the gap from one dipole to the next is enough that the mutual impedances among the dipoles are all small, then each dipole will have current very nearly in phase with the others and the radiation pattern will be perpendicular to the axis of the dipoles. It's a messier feed arrangement, but it's much better for keeping the antenna currents in phase along the whole antenna across a relatively wide frequency range. You can avoid the problem of different feedpoint impedances due to mutual coupling by using lines of an odd number of quarter wavelengths to feed the elements. If you use lines of those lengths all going back to a common point, the currents in the elements will forced to be equal in amplitude and phase regardless of differences in their feedpoint impedances. There's more about this in Chapter 8 of the _ARRL Antenna Book_. It's become known as the "current forcing" method. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Velocity factor | Antenna | |||
velocity factor??? | Antenna | |||
Velocity Factor (VP) for RG8X? | Antenna | |||
Measuring Velocity Factor w/ MFJ-259 | Equipment | |||
Measuring Velocity Factor w/ MFJ-259 | Homebrew |