Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
I agree. I think it's quite possible that even a decoupled feedline will add enough radiation to make the antenna noticeably better than it really is. I'd prefer to see the source mounted *at* the antenna to make it a decent comparison. __________ Unless this antenna is itself balanced, most likely for best efficiency when operating in this configuration there would need to be a conductor running from the elevated tx chassis to a good r-f ground of some kind, either buried in the earth or in the form of a counterpoise. Radiation from that "ground" conductor could be many times greater than from what is considered to be the antenna -- even though no feedline is present.. This is a common configuration used for so-called Part 15 AM installations to get greater groundwave coverage from the 100 mW tx input power allowed under FCC Part 15.219, by ignoring the 3-meter limit on the length of the radiating structure given there. RF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
constrained listening criteria: | Shortwave | |||
A Small Indoor FM Antenna | Antenna | |||
Good Small Antenna | CB | |||
Common Criteria | Swap | |||
Small Directional Antenna | Antenna |