Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 6, 4:49 pm, Derek wrote:
Spoken like a true neanderthal, they also refused to embrace new ways of doing things and look what happened to them. You are living in the past, keep on digging. Derek Well, where is the beef? Do you have any actual data to support these magic claims? Hummm.. Thought not.. I'm using actual experience with antennas to support my disbelief. If what he says is true, I'd likely already be using one.. I'm not against a dinky 160m antenna with full size performance. But until I actually see one work... Well, you might get it, or you might not.. How can I live in the past? I can only remember the past. And *nowhere* in the past have I ever seen such a device actually work as claimed. So put up the data, or you get to digging... You kind of remind me of that "Bret" dude who calls himself John Smith, or whatever... :/ I'd rather be a slopehead than believe in the tooth fairy, free lunches, and antennas that don't follow the rules of science. I have no doubt his antenna may radiate some.. But then again, most dummy loads do also.. Tales of QSO's using light bulb dummy loads used to be quite common back in the past, which I can still remember going back to the time of swatting at colorful plastic butterflies hanging above my head in my baby crib. MK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
constrained listening criteria: | Shortwave | |||
A Small Indoor FM Antenna | Antenna | |||
Good Small Antenna | CB | |||
Common Criteria | Swap | |||
Small Directional Antenna | Antenna |