Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:13:54 -0500, Mike Coslo
wrote: Coherent light is not the half of it! We are both more and less advanced than we might think. Hi Mike, Coherence has become a shallow rhyming proof rendered as "SoThereIt's!" (a mumbled qed). It is a convenience of a special solution which requires artificial constraints that over the course of "debate" have become necessary correlatives to a general "law" of optics. In fact, few have examined what "coherence" actually means, but instead it has been Xeroxed by Cecil into the argument. Both Mike and Tom have been able to disconnect this term as one of necessity for monochromaticity (not required) and instantaneity (also not required). This lack of requirement (that requirement having been artificially injected into the discussion) is historically exhibited in work going beyond 100 years old. The first work was with sun/starlight that is neither pulsed nor monochromatic, and yet and all, interference was clearly found which led us to this discussion. Even though the classic hologram, developed 60 years ago, or so, was originally monochromatic; it didn't take much more effort to accomplish the same photography with white light (1968). Wide band sources can demonstrate interference as readily there as with the original Michelson-Morely interferometer. In fact, most here need only open their wallet to examine a credit card or driver's license to prove this to themselves under a common table lamp. Coherence (cross-correlating) is a statistical term for comparing (0.00 to 1.00) complex waves. You can have temporal coherence, spacial coherence, spectral coherence and on and on; none of which are actually named here, but whose various definitions have been notoriously cross-connected into a hodge-podge argument of no particular merit. If we delve into the merits of sun/starlight, we eventually narrow on into the distinction of these terms of spatial and temporal coherence and the coherent area/length/volume (where incoherent sunlight is found to be coherent within 0.02mm) and then into what has already been identified by Gene with partial coherence (a topic that Wolf pursued, and at which Born hesitated). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sad Story | Policy | |||
(OT) Story of the Day 1 | Shortwave | |||
Top Story | Shortwave | |||
The whole story... | CB | |||
The Whole Story | CB |