Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
billcalley wrote:
Hi All, I always hear that antennas have to be matched to their radio, but in receivers (such as FM and shortwave radios) I see mostly long random length antennas used, and these antennas -- be they a telescoping whip or a long wire out a window -- are used over some really wide bandwidths. How is this possible if an impedance match must always be maintained for radios? And since there cannot be a good match over such wide bandwidths with any (typical) wire antenna, what is the downside to using these completely unmatched long antennas for receivers? (Poor gain patterns with lots of nulls? Lower sensitivity due to bad noise figure or gain match for any LNA or frontend amp? Degraded overall antenna gain)? Thanks; I'm very confused on this subject! -Bill Bill; I haven't looked at the back of a radio in a long time, but those that I have looked at usually had a trimmer capacitor that helped tune the antenna to the radio input. This is the impedance match you are looking at. Dave WD9BDZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 15, 3:11*am, billcalley wrote:
Hi All, * *I always hear that antennas have to be matched to their radio, but in receivers (such as FM and shortwave radios) I see mostly long random length antennas used, and these antennas -- be they a telescoping whip or a long wire out a window -- are used over some really wide bandwidths. *How is this possible if an impedance match must always be maintained for radios? *And since there cannot be a good match over such wide bandwidths with any (typical) wire antenna, what is the downside to using these completely unmatched long antennas for receivers? *(Poor gain patterns with lots of nulls? *Lower sensitivity due to bad noise figure or gain match for any LNA or frontend amp? Degraded overall antenna gain)? Thanks; I'm very confused on this subject! -Bill Well, I 'm not an expert, but it seems that with a transmitting antenna, the idea is to transfer as much power as possible to increase efficiency, and so the antenna needs to be closely matched to the output of the transmitter for best results. But the receiving antenna is a different problem, since no power from the antenna is needed to drive the receiver, and so who cares about the match? The idea with the receiving antenna is to get the most voltage and highest S/N ratio with no load. The input to the receiver should be buffered with a high impedance FET amplifier, or some such, so the receiver draws almost no power from the antenna. This leaves you free to design the antenna and input tuning circuit for the highest Q and lowest noise figure without worrying about impedance match. Just my opinion. -Bill |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3ÔÂ15ÈÕ, ÏÂÎç7ʱ11·Ö, billcalley wrote:
Hi All, I always hear that antennas have to be matched to their radio, but in receivers (such as FM and shortwave radios) I see mostly long random length antennas used, and these antennas -- be they a telescoping whip or a long wire out a window -- are used over some really wide bandwidths. How is this possible if an impedance match must always be maintained for radios? And since there cannot be a good match over such wide bandwidths with any (typical) wire antenna, what is the downside to using these completely unmatched long antennas for receivers? (Poor gain patterns with lots of nulls? Lower sensitivity due to bad noise figure or gain match for any LNA or frontend amp? Degraded overall antenna gain)? Thanks; I'm very confused on this subject! -Bill Do you want access to China's massive pool of electronic manufacturers... but lack the time to contact suppliers, negotiate contracts, arrange shipping or monitor product quality? Don't worry - Let seriouswholesale deal with all that for you. *Check out the huge range of Gadgets, MP3 / MP4 Players, Car DVD / Audio, and Computer Accessories now by visiting the online wholesale catalog at seriouswholesale. com You'll have peace of mind thanks to the seriouswholesale Quality Control, 12-month Warranty on all products, and easy secure payment by credit card through Paypal. Selling on eBay or your own online store? Send products direct from our warehouse to your customers using our unique drop-shipping service. You can profit by selling hundreds of different products, without holding any of your own inventory! Any questions you have will be answered by the seriouswholesale English-speaking customer support team... Their aim is to make your China electronics importing business easier to run than ever before. Welcome to http://www.seriouswholesale.com. seriouswholesale - Buy from the source, profit without the hassle. - 12 Months Warranty - No minimum order restrictions - Drop-shipping with no additional fee - Pay by safely by PayPal seriouswholesale Wholesale Co., Ltd.: Chinas original and best online electronics wholesaler & drop-shipper: seriouswholesale. com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3ÔÂ15ÈÕ, ÏÂÎç7ʱ11·Ö, billcalley wrote:
Hi All, I always hear that antennas have to be matched to their radio, but in receivers (such as FM and shortwave radios) I see mostly long random length antennas used, and these antennas -- be they a telescoping whip or a long wire out a window -- are used over some really wide bandwidths. How is this possible if an impedance match must always be maintained for radios? And since there cannot be a good match over such wide bandwidths with any (typical) wire antenna, what is the downside to using these completely unmatched long antennas for receivers? (Poor gain patterns with lots of nulls? Lower sensitivity due to bad noise figure or gain match for any LNA or frontend amp? Degraded overall antenna gain)? Thanks; I'm very confused on this subject! -Bill Do you want access to China's massive pool of electronic manufacturers... but lack the time to contact suppliers, negotiate contracts, arrange shipping or monitor product quality? Don't worry - Let seriouswholesale deal with all that for you. *Check out the huge range of Gadgets, MP3 / MP4 Players, Car DVD / Audio, and Computer Accessories now by visiting the online wholesale catalog at seriouswholesale. com You'll have peace of mind thanks to the seriouswholesale Quality Control, 12-month Warranty on all products, and easy secure payment by credit card through Paypal. Selling on eBay or your own online store? Send products direct from our warehouse to your customers using our unique drop-shipping service. You can profit by selling hundreds of different products, without holding any of your own inventory! Any questions you have will be answered by the seriouswholesale English-speaking customer support team... Their aim is to make your China electronics importing business easier to run than ever before. Welcome to http://www.seriouswholesale.com. seriouswholesale - Buy from the source, profit without the hassle. - 12 Months Warranty - No minimum order restrictions - Drop-shipping with no additional fee - Pay by safely by PayPal seriouswholesale Wholesale Co., Ltd.: Chinas original and best online electronics wholesaler & drop-shipper: seriouswholesale. com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3ÔÂ15ÈÕ, ÏÂÎç7ʱ11·Ö, billcalley wrote:
Hi All, I always hear that antennas have to be matched to their radio, but in receivers (such as FM and shortwave radios) I see mostly long random length antennas used, and these antennas -- be they a telescoping whip or a long wire out a window -- are used over some really wide bandwidths. How is this possible if an impedance match must always be maintained for radios? And since there cannot be a good match over such wide bandwidths with any (typical) wire antenna, what is the downside to using these completely unmatched long antennas for receivers? (Poor gain patterns with lots of nulls? Lower sensitivity due to bad noise figure or gain match for any LNA or frontend amp? Degraded overall antenna gain)? Thanks; I'm very confused on this subject! -Bill Do you want access to China's massive pool of electronic manufacturers... but lack the time to contact suppliers, negotiate contracts, arrange shipping or monitor product quality? Don't worry - Let seriouswholesale deal with all that for you. *Check out the huge range of Gadgets, MP3 / MP4 Players, Car DVD / Audio, and Computer Accessories now by visiting the online wholesale catalog at seriouswholesale. com You'll have peace of mind thanks to the seriouswholesale Quality Control, 12-month Warranty on all products, and easy secure payment by credit card through Paypal. Selling on eBay or your own online store? Send products direct from our warehouse to your customers using our unique drop-shipping service. You can profit by selling hundreds of different products, without holding any of your own inventory! Any questions you have will be answered by the seriouswholesale English-speaking customer support team... Their aim is to make your China electronics importing business easier to run than ever before. Welcome to http://www.seriouswholesale.com. seriouswholesale - Buy from the source, profit without the hassle. - 12 Months Warranty - No minimum order restrictions - Drop-shipping with no additional fee - Pay by safely by PayPal seriouswholesale Wholesale Co., Ltd.: Chinas original and best online electronics wholesaler & drop-shipper: seriouswholesale. com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not sure about the higher frequencies but in the HF band we absolutely need
an antenna coupler that matches the impedance to the selected frequency. If a coupler fails we can barely throw a signal a few miles whereas when the coupler does it's job we can bounce a signal off of the ionosphere at night for a few thousand miles. Claude Montreal "billcalley" wrote in message ... Hi All, I always hear that antennas have to be matched to their radio, but in receivers (such as FM and shortwave radios) I see mostly long random length antennas used, and these antennas -- be they a telescoping whip or a long wire out a window -- are used over some really wide bandwidths. How is this possible if an impedance match must always be maintained for radios? And since there cannot be a good match over such wide bandwidths with any (typical) wire antenna, what is the downside to using these completely unmatched long antennas for receivers? (Poor gain patterns with lots of nulls? Lower sensitivity due to bad noise figure or gain match for any LNA or frontend amp? Degraded overall antenna gain)? Thanks; I'm very confused on this subject! -Bill |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not sure about the higher frequencies but in the HF band we absolutely need
an antenna coupler that matches the impedance to the selected frequency. If a coupler fails we can barely throw a signal a few miles whereas when the coupler does it's job we can bounce a signal off of the ionosphere at night for a few thousand miles. That's certainly true at the transmitting end. A good impedance match is needed in order to enable the transmitter to deliver power effectively into the antenna, from whence it can be radiated. It's rather less true at the receiving end, at least in the lower- frequency HF bands. In these bands, the ability to receive a usable signal is often dominated by the amount of natural and man-made noise in the band, and not by the receiver's own self-generated noise. Even with a serious impedance mismatch between the antenna and the receiver, enough signal reaches the receiver front-end to overcome the receiver's own internal noise. If you happen to live in an area which is blessed by a very low background-noise level (e.g. out in the country, away from power lines) and you're DXing in the HF bands, then a good impedance-matched antenna will let your receiver take best advantage of the low noise level. If you're SWLing in a city, surrounded by power lines and electric motors and neon lights and computers, the background noise level is going to be much higher, and the weak distant stations will be drowned out by the noise anyhow... and an inefficiently-matched antenna such as a whip or longwire will give you enough signal to hear the stations which are _not_ drowned out by the noise. As an example - if your receiver has decent sensitivity, and a low internal noise level, you may find that you can hear a signal with decent audio quality all the way down to S0 or below (if there's no noise obscuring it). You then find that with an impedance-matched antenna the band's background noise is S6 or so. Assuming that you can make use of a signal which is somewhat below the broadband noise level, let's say that you decide you can copy stations whose own individual signals are S5 or better, and that lower-level signals are blanketed by the noise. At this point, you realize that you can use an antenna which is 5 S-points (nominally, 30 dB) less efficient, and still receive the same set of stations. With a less efficient antenna, the stations' signals will be weaker... but so will the external band noise, by the same ratio, and thus the signal-to-noise ratio of each station will remain unchanged. As an example, my ARES/RACES group has a multiband HF setup in our city's police and fire admin building, which is downtown near the main commercial-and-restaurant street and the light-rail system. We have a trap-dipole antenna strung up above the building's roof. On the 80-meter band, the broadband noise level across the whole band is rarely less than S9! We could probably receive the same set of stations using an antenna consisting of two coat-hangers and some damp string! -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:11:21 -0700 (PDT), billcalley
wrote: Hi All, I always hear that antennas have to be matched to their radio, but in receivers (such as FM and shortwave radios) I see mostly long random length antennas used, and these antennas -- be they a telescoping whip or a long wire out a window -- are used over some really wide bandwidths. How is this possible if an impedance match must always be maintained for radios? And since there cannot be a good match over such wide bandwidths with any (typical) wire antenna, what is the downside to using these completely unmatched long antennas for receivers? (Poor gain patterns with lots of nulls? Lower sensitivity due to bad noise figure or gain match for any LNA or frontend amp? Degraded overall antenna gain)? Thanks; I'm very confused on this subject! -Bill In a short answer to your question, NO! The finals won't burn out as there are none and you won't be feeding radiation into your room. However, as you probably noticed from the FM radio with the extendable antenna, you sometimes get a better signal when you extend the antenna nd move it to the right location. A good (and matched) antenna may allow you to receive signals you could not have received with a random length antenna. Most radios that I have seen usually have a matching network built in to match the antenna that comes with the radio. In most cases they aren't that elaborate, just a small coil and a trimmer capacitor. My father learned that as great as his 50 foot long copper wire worked for listening to his favorite short wave broadcasts, the signals improved immensely when I installed an fan-dipole for his three favorite bands. Did he 'need' that antenna? no, he could hear his stations without it, but the signal strength was improved and he was able to pick up more stations. Dad also ordered an antenna tuner kit, assembled it and attached it to his 50 foot wire. He found a great improvement in signal strength using the tuner, almost equal to the multi-band dipole I installed. Signal to noise ratio are not synonymous with gain. One can have a lower-gain antenna with high s/n that outperforms a higher-gain antenna with low s/n. When it gets critical, the s/n can be the determining factor as to whether you receive intelligent communication or not. You are probably digging for technical, theoretical information more than practical, but just in case... If you look in stereo magazines, you seldom see radio ads bragging about how much better they receive than the competition. If you look in Ham magazines, that's a very important feature. Most consumers are looking for stereos that play music well and they listen to local stations. Most ham operators want to pull that weak signal out of the noise to make the contact. Just some thoughts. Hope this is helpful to someone. Buck N4PGW -- 73 for now Buck, N4PGW www.lumpuckeroo.com "Small - broadband - efficient: pick any two." |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 15, 9:11*am, billcalley wrote:
Hi All, * *I always hear that antennas have to be matched to their radio, but in receivers (such as FM and shortwave radios) I see mostly long random length antennas used, and these antennas -- be they a telescoping whip or a long wire out a window -- are used over some really wide bandwidths. *How is this possible if an impedance match must always be maintained for radios? *And since there cannot be a good match over such wide bandwidths with any (typical) wire antenna, what is the downside to using these completely unmatched long antennas for receivers? *(Poor gain patterns with lots of nulls? *Lower sensitivity due to bad noise figure or gain match for any LNA or frontend amp? Degraded overall antenna gain)? Thanks; I'm very confused on this subject! -Bill What has not been mentioned much is that AM band broadcast receivers and FM band receivers are designed to to tune over a fairly wide band of frequencies; so very difficult to build antenna that will mtach at all those different 'wavelengths'. For example; the broadcast band (North America) is roughly 550 kilohertz (that's 545 metres wavelength) to about 1.7 megahertz (about 176 metres). That's 3:1 ratio! On FM, 88 to 108 megahertz (3.4 to 2.8 metres) the ratio is less but still cnsiderable at 1.2:1 So again very difficult to design and build an 'all frequencies' antenna. For stations designed to receive only one frequncy the antennae can be constructed for that only; hence the matching can be as optimum as possible. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, terryS wrote: For example; the broadcast band (North America) is roughly 550 kilohertz (that's 545 metres wavelength) to about 1.7 megahertz (about 176 metres). That's 3:1 ratio! HOWEVER, if you will look at the Antenna Design for a AM Broadcast Receiver, using a Ferrite Loop Antenna, you WILL notice that the Loop IS Tuned to the specific part of the band that the receiver is being tuned to, by Linked Ganged Variable Capacitors, in the Receivers Frontend. These designs have been around for MANY years, (1940's anyway) and are a very mature technology. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
matching masts as vertical antennas. | Antenna | |||
FS: Mosley CM-1 Receiver and Matching Speaker | Boatanchors | |||
Z matching of antennas | Antenna | |||
FS: Knight R-100A Receiver and matching speaker. | Boatanchors | |||
FS: Knight R-100A Receiver and matching speaker. | Boatanchors |