Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 7th 08, 10:05 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 329
Default Efficiency of 200-ohm hairpin matching

On 7 abr, 00:33, "Antonio Vernucci" wrote:
When I understand you correctly, the series component of the dipole
input impedance is 200 Ohm? I would expect value lower then 70
Ohms.


the series component is probably just 25 ohm or so (due to the effect of the
parasitic elements), but it is brought up to 200 ohm by shortening the dipole
length and putting an hairpin in parallel (very well known technique to increase
impedance). As a matter fact it matches very well with a 4-to-1 balun

When 200 Ohms real component of Zi, you used a series hairpin to
cancel the capacitive component.


No, the hairpin is in parallel to the dipole



You can guess the loss by calculating
the AC resistance of the pin.


Assuming homogeneous current distribution around the circumference,
you can calculate the AC resistance with (assuming length of hairpin
0.15 lambda):


Rac = 80*10^-9*sqrt(f)*le/d , Rac in Ohm, f in Hz, le (wire length)
in m, d (diameter of wire) in m, valid for copper. For other
materials (non magnetic), when conductance is factor 4 less (so 4
times higher spec. resistance), Rac doubles.


When the result for your hairpin 200 Ohm, the loss is negligible.


In case of a parallel pin, you can use same technique, but in that
case you have to calculate the inductance of the pin. With the
inductance you know the reactance and the current that runs through it
(for example with 100Vrms across it). With Rac you can calculate the
power loss.


Having all data available, it is clearly possible to calculate losses using the
Ohm law. Mine was a question of more general nature. Does anyone have direct
experience on whether the extra loss of a 200-ohm hairpin match (with respect to
the more conventional 50-ohm hairpin match) is in pratice noticeable?

Thanks & 73

Tony I0JX


Hello Tony,

Given your data and some assumptions about hairpin construction and
use, loss is negligible.

Best regards,

Wim
PA3DJS
www.tetech.nl
please remove abc from the mail address.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Efficiency of Vertical .J.S... Antenna 10 May 19th 07 01:18 PM
Efficiency art Antenna 17 March 17th 07 02:58 AM
Request for information on phase matching and set / batch matching David Antenna 7 November 23rd 06 12:40 AM
Yagi Hairpin Match muskie Antenna 2 March 24th 05 08:52 AM
Building a Matching Transformer for Shortwave Listener's Antenna using a Binocular Ferrite Core from a TV type Matching Transformer RHF Shortwave 13 November 3rd 04 08:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017